Fintech
FinTechFintechfintech
Providers using this tag (1963)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 28 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 98 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 307 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 266 Limited public surface area
Emerging 582 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 648 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 34 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (55)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fintech” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1827 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fintech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.9 | 26.5 | +2.4 | 1827 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 24 | 23.4 | +0.6 | 1827 |
| Discoverability | 61.6 | 61.2 | +0.4 | 1827 |
| Contract Governance | 5.8 | 6.4 | -0.6 | 1827 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.4 | 14 | -0.6 | 1827 |
| Contract Quality | 18.4 | 19.8 | -1.4 | 1827 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Airwallex 91.4
- 2 Tabby 80.6
- 3 Stripe 79.7
- 4 PAY.JP 76.4
- 5 Klarna 76.3
- 6 MX Technologies 75.6
- 7 Stax 75.3
- 8 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 72.3
- 9 Blnk Finance 71.8
- 10 Highnote 71.8
- 1 Mollie 69.8
- 2 AlphaAI 68.5
- 3 Agentcard 68.3
- 4 Natural AI 67.6
- 5 Clear Street 63.2
- 6 Polygon 63.1
- 7 Caplight 62.3
- 8 Alpha Vantage 61.9
- 9 Tabs 60.2
- 10 Alpaca 58.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.