Fintech
Providers using this tag (1992)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 75 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 296 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 297 Limited public surface area
Emerging 585 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 708 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (38)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fintech” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
1992 providers carry this tag directly, and 3281 counting the 33 narrower tags below and the 65 beneath them — 1289 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1859 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fintech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.7 | 26.5 | +2.2 | 1859 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 | 23.2 | +0.6 | 1859 |
| Discoverability | 58.6 | 58.1 | +0.5 | 1859 |
| Contract Governance | 5.7 | 6.3 | -0.6 | 1859 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.1 | 13.7 | -0.6 | 1859 |
| Contract Quality | 16.7 | 17.6 | -0.9 | 1859 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 12% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Plaid 86.1
- 2 Airwallex 85.3
- 3 Stripe 81.6
- 4 Tabby 77.1
- 5 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 75.8
- 6 Hilt 72.4
- 7 Stax 72.4
- 8 Klarna 71.8
- 9 MX Technologies 71
- 10 PAY.JP 70.8
- 1 Natural AI 71.2
- 2 Mollie 69.8
- 3 Agentcard 68.3
- 4 Allowance 66.9
- 5 AlphaAI 66
- 6 Clear Street 63.2
- 7 Caplight 62.3
- 8 Airwallex 61.6
- 9 Daloopa 61.5
- 10 Hilt 61.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.