GLEIF LEI Issuers (Legal Entity Identifier infrastructure)

Where this market publishes its structure

• GLEIF accredited LEI issuers (api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-issuers, JSON:API) machine-readable, 41 LOUs with LEI + website + accreditation date; 3 linked (Bloomberg, GS1, InfoCert); 5 held as subsidiaries on a parent's domain; 2 public-sector hosts; 31 not in the catalog
• GLEIF qualified vLEI issuers (api.gleif.org/api/v1/vlei-issuers) machine-readable, 8 QVIs (CFCA, TOPPAN Edge, Global vLEI, SHECA, Certizen, Finema, Provenant, TradeGo); 0 in the catalog
• GLEIF Registration Authorities List (api.gleif.org/api/v1/registration-authorities) machine-readable, 1,138 registers, 1,128 with a website; 415 public-sector hosts held; 3 linked repos all regulators (held); 0 edges
• GLEIF registration agents (api.gleif.org/api/v1/registration-agents) machine-readable, 73 agents; resellers of an LOU's issuance, held by rule; 0 resolve to a catalog repo
• GLEIF LEI records per provider (api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records?filter[entity.legalName]=) machine-readable, not used as an edge source: holding an LEI makes a company an end-user of the LEI system, and Level 1 data carries no website to bridge a domain
• GLEIF Validation Agents (gleif.org/en/lei-solutions/validation-agents) not machine-readable: no list published; the page carries testimonials naming 7 organisations (FinClusive, Rubix, VerifyVASP, CFCA, Sparkasse Bank Malta, MNS Credit, E-Arbitrator), not a register; the API has no validation-agents endpoint (404)

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 30 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

undeclared 30 · declares nothing we can read: no number