Compliance
Compliancecompliance
Providers using this tag (740)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 48 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 170 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 138 Limited public surface area
Emerging 247 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 120 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (447)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 24 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 205 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 87 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 78 Limited public surface area
Emerging 50 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (155)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Compliance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 155 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 711 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Compliance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 36.1 | 26.5 | +9.6 | 711 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.9 | 23.4 | +5.5 | 711 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.7 | 13.9 | +3.8 | 711 |
| Contract Quality | 23.2 | 19.8 | +3.4 | 711 |
| Discoverability | 64.1 | 61.2 | +2.9 | 711 |
| Contract Governance | 9.3 | 6.4 | +2.9 | 711 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OpenSanctions 74.6
- 2 Remote 72.6
- 3 Postman 72.5
- 4 Paubox 71.5
- 5 OneTrust 68.2
- 6 Uphold 68
- 7 iDenfy 66.2
- 8 Deel 65.7
- 9 Dow Jones Developer Platform 65.7
- 10 ControlUp 65.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.