Compliance
Compliancecompliance
Providers using this tag (863)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 68 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 202 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 161 Limited public surface area
Emerging 277 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 136 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (315)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 51 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 89 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 84 Limited public surface area
Emerging 65 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 863 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Compliance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35 | 22.3 | +12.7 | 863 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.5 | 17.9 | +10.6 | 863 |
| Contract Quality | 26.4 | 17.5 | +8.9 | 863 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.4 | 11.3 | +7.1 | 863 |
| Discoverability | 66 | 60.4 | +5.6 | 863 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.4 | +4.8 | 863 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 16% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 7% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 13% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 SendPulse 75.7
- 2 Highnote 75.4
- 3 Dynatrace 71.8
- 4 Adobe Suite 71.2
- 5 Remote 69.9
- 6 Cvent Event Cloud 69.6
- 7 Tealium 69.2
- 8 Uphold 69.1
- 9 New Relic 68.8
- 10 lemlist 68.3
- 1 lemlist 63.9
- 2 Adobe Suite 61.5
- 3 Didit 56.7
- 4 SendPulse 55.8
- 5 Topograph 55.2
- 6 Triple Whale 54
- 7 Conviva 53.6
- 8 Goethena 53.4
- 9 Figma 53.2
- 10 Factset 52.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/compliance"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/compliance"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/compliance/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.