Compliance
Providers using this tag (765)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 55 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 171 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 140 Limited public surface area
Emerging 247 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 135 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (269)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 35 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 39 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 75 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 61 Limited public surface area
Emerging 52 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (145)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Compliance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 145 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
766 providers carry this tag directly, and 897 counting the 7 narrower tags below — 132 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 741 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Compliance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 37 | 26.5 | +10.5 | 741 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.6 | 23.2 | +6.4 | 741 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.2 | 13.7 | +4.5 | 741 |
| Discoverability | 62.2 | 58.1 | +4.1 | 741 |
| Contract Quality | 21.4 | 17.6 | +3.8 | 741 |
| Contract Governance | 9.3 | 6.3 | +3 | 741 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 14% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 12% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 79.6
- 2 ControlUp 75
- 3 Hive Civilization 74.1
- 4 IBANforge 74
- 5 Remote 73.7
- 6 OneTrust 72.7
- 7 Uphold 70.6
- 8 Drata 70.2
- 9 FeedOracle Technologies 69.5
- 10 TaskHawk Systems 69.4
- 1 FeedOracle Technologies 62.8
- 2 Paubox 61.5
- 3 Didit 59.8
- 4 Topograph 56.7
- 5 Tesser 56.1
- 6 OneTrust 55.9
- 7 CoreStack 55.5
- 8 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 9 Lukka 55
- 10 Postman 54.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.