Audit
Auditaudit
Providers using this tag (51)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (138)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 36 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 50 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (108)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Audit” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 108 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Audit, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35.7 | 26.5 | +9.2 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.2 | 14 | +6.2 | 50 |
| Contract Quality | 25 | 19.8 | +5.2 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.4 | 23.4 | +5 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 61.2 | +2.6 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.4 | +1.8 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 10% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 20% | 13% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 14% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Drata 65.4
- 2 Barndoor 65.1
- 3 anecdotes 63.1
- 4 Google Vault 59.7
- 5 Secureframe 56.3
- 6 Amazon CloudTrail 54.3
- 7 Duvo Ai 53.9
- 8 RegScale 50.9
- 9 Credo AI 50.3
- 10 Adaptive Automation Technologies 50
- 1 Duvo Ai 63.1
- 2 Drata 48.6
- 3 Secureframe 43.9
- 4 anecdotes 36.7
- 5 Accept 34
- 6 Google Vault 33.6
- 7 Wegalvanize 32.9
- 8 Fieldguide 32.9
- 9 Credo AI 30.8
- 10 LogicGate 29
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.