IDwall

IDwall (idwall.co) is a Brazilian identity verification, KYC, and anti-fraud platform. Its REST API lets companies run background checks and consult public data sources, validate documents such as the CNH (Brazilian driver's license), assemble verification reports (relatorios) from configurable matrices (matrizes), retrieve previously queried people (pessoas), and receive webhook notifications when a report's status changes. Authentication is a per-account API token passed in the Authorization header; the production base URL is https://api-v2.idwall.co and all responses are JSON. There is no sandbox - contracted tokens run against production. IDwall was backed by 500 Global and GGV Capital.

IDwall is listed with 1 API on the APIs.io network. Tagged areas include Company, Identity Verification, KYC, Fraud Prevention, and Background Checks.

The IDwall catalog on APIs.io includes 1 event-driven AsyncAPI specification.

IDwall’s developer surface includes documentation, API reference, getting-started guide, engineering blog, support, changelog, authentication, and 13 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

31.0/100 thin ▬ flat Agent 26/100 agent aware Heartbeat 51/100 slowing saas Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0 · Show this score on your site →

1 API

Company Identity Verification KYC Fraud Prevention Background Checks Document Verification Compliance Onboarding Brazil

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0

Composite quality — 31.0/100 · thin

Contract Quality 8.3 / 21

Developer Ergonomics 8.5 / 17

Access Clarity 1.1 / 17

Operational Transparency 2.6 / 11

Contract Governance 0.0 / 10

Discoverability 6.2 / 9

Regulatory Posture 1.8 / 15

Agent readiness — 26/100 · agent aware

Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 0 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 0 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 10 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 8 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7

Typed Event Surface 6 / 6

Agent Skills 0 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 4 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 0 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform) regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics could not be measured. We hold no machine-readable contract for this provider to read, so there is nothing to measure a write surface against. Excluded rather than scored zero: never-measured and measured-empty are different facts. Publishing an OpenAPI is what makes this facet — and several others — scorable at all.

The six quality facets above are damped to 85 points between them, because the conditional facet above carries the other 15. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 85% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/idwall/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/idwall/card.svg" alt="IDwall on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

MCP Server +12 pts — deployment.mode + probe verdict on the mcp/ manifest, not the pointer; an unprobed slug falls back to authorship
Agentic Access Contract +10 pts — agentic_access artifact present (x-agentic-access), graded by author
Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented)
A2A Agent Card +8 pts — a2a/-a2a.yml manifest, graded on conformance.grade against A2A 1.0.0
Rate-Limit Signaling +7 pts — OpenAPI responses document X-RateLimit-* / RateLimit headers (verified), else a rate_limits artifact or RateLimits link (documented)
Request/Response Examples +7 pts — share of operations carrying request/response examples; else an Examples / Code Samples link

8 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Access Clarity scores 6.6 — up to +18.7 composite points
Contract Quality scores 39.0 — up to +15.3 composite points
Contract Governance scores 0.0 — up to +12.0 composite points

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/idwall/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/idwall to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Markets this provider is in provisional

The Kin Score Market layer reads a provider inside its market: its position, and how deep its integrations go. Depth is only comparable within a position. Provisional and unweighted: not part of the Kin Score or agent readiness.

Market	Position	Depth	Registered MCP server	Declares compatibility
Biometrics Testing (biometric recognition vendors, identity verification depth)	standard	23.6 (thin)	-	1

Registered MCP server and declares compatibility are report only — not weighted. Undeclared means we found nothing we can read, so there is no number: we never infer integrations.

APIs 1

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

IDwall API v2

RESTful JSON API for identity verification, background checks, public-data consultation, document (CNH) validation, verification reports (relatorios) built from configurable mat...

Event Specifications 1

AsyncAPI definitions for this provider's event-driven and streaming APIs.

Idwall Webhooks

ASYNCAPI

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Idwall Authentication

apiKey · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Idwall Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DNSSEC · DMARC

SECURITY

Resources

Get Started 3

Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call

DeveloperPortal

DeveloperPortal

GettingStarted

GettingStarted

Login

Documentation 2

Reference material describing how the API behaves

Documentation

Documentation

APIReference

APIReference

Agent Surfaces 2

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

LLMsTxt

LLMsTxt

WellKnown

WellKnown

Design & Contract 4

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

ErrorCatalog

Conventions

Lifecycle

Webhooks

Build 1

SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with

Packages

Packages

Access & Security 2

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Authentication

Authentication

DomainSecurity

DomainSecurity

Operate 3

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Support

Support

ChangeLog

ChangeLog

ChangeLog

ChangeLog

Company 3

The organization behind the API

BlogRSS

BlogRSS

Website

Website

Blog

Blog

Source (apis.yml)

aid: idwall
name: IDwall
description: IDwall (idwall.co) is a Brazilian identity verification, KYC, and anti-fraud platform. Its REST API lets companies
  run background checks and consult public data sources, validate documents such as the CNH (Brazilian driver's license),
  assemble verification reports (relatorios) from configurable matrices (matrizes), retrieve previously queried people (pessoas),
  and receive webhook notifications when a report's status changes. Authentication is a per-account API token passed in the
  Authorization header; the production base URL is https://api-v2.idwall.co and all responses are JSON. There is no sandbox
  - contracted tokens run against production. IDwall was backed by 500 Global and GGV Capital.
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/api-evangelist/idwall/refs/heads/main/apis.yml
deliveryModel:
  model: saas
  open_source: false
  commercial: true
  callable_host: false
  label: Hosted service · you call their endpoint
  confidence: medium
  source:
  - pricing
  generated: '2026-08-28'
  method: derived
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  source:
  - authentication
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-06'
  method: derived
image: https://idwall.co/static/favicon.png
x-type: company
x-source: vc-portfolio
x-backed-by:
- 500-global
- ggv-capital
x-tier: stub
x-tier-reason: portfolio-lead
specificationVersion: '0.23'
created: '2026-07-17'
modified: '2026-10-06'
x-docs-platform: readme
x-docs-platform-confidence: high
x-docs-platform-checked: 2026-10-03
tags:
- Company
- Identity Verification
- KYC
- Fraud Prevention
- Background Checks
- Document Verification
- Compliance
- Onboarding
- Brazil
apis:
- name: IDwall API v2
  description: RESTful JSON API for identity verification, background checks, public-data consultation, document (CNH) validation,
    verification reports (relatorios) built from configurable matrices (matrizes), people (pessoas) lookups, and webhooks.
    Authentication is a per-account token in the Authorization header.
  humanURL: https://docs.idwall.co
  baseURL: https://api-v2.idwall.co
  properties:
  - type: Documentation
    url: https://docs.idwall.co
  - type: APIReference
    url: https://docs.idwall.co/reference
  - type: GettingStarted
    url: https://docs.idwall.co/reference/por-onde-comecar
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com
- FN: APIs.json
  email: info@apis.io
common:
- url: https://blog.idwall.co/feed/
  type: BlogRSS
- type: Website
  url: https://idwall.co
- type: DeveloperPortal
  url: https://docs.idwall.co
- type: Documentation
  url: https://docs.idwall.co
- type: APIReference
  url: https://docs.idwall.co/reference
- type: GettingStarted
  url: https://docs.idwall.co/reference/por-onde-comecar
- type: Blog
  url: https://idwall.co/blog
- type: Login
  url: https://dashboard.idwall.co
- type: Support
  url: https://idwall.co/contato/
- type: ChangeLog
  url: https://docs.idwall.co/changelog
- type: LLMsTxt
  url: llms/idwall-llms.txt
- type: Authentication
  url: authentication/idwall-authentication.yml
- type: ErrorCatalog
  url: errors/idwall-problem-types.yml
- type: Conventions
  url: conventions/idwall-conventions.yml
- type: Lifecycle
  url: lifecycle/idwall-lifecycle.yml
- type: ChangeLog
  name: IDwall changelog artifact
  url: changelog/idwall-changelog.yml
- type: WellKnown
  url: well-known/idwall-well-known.yml
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/idwall-domain-security.yml
- type: Packages
  url: packages/idwall-packages.yml
- type: Webhooks
  url: asyncapi/idwall-webhooks.yml
x-enrichment:
  date: '2026-07-19'
  status: backfilled
  pass: local-v1
  note: backfilled from .gitignore signal + verified work evidence

IDwall API — frequently asked questions

Does IDwall have an API?

Yes. APIs.io lists 1 API from IDwall, including IDwall API v2.

How do I authenticate with the IDwall API?

IDwall uses bearer-token authentication (apiKey · 1 scheme). The details are profiled on APIs.io as Idwall Authentication.

Is the IDwall API ready for AI agents?

IDwall has a Kin Score of 31.0 out of 100 (thin) and an Agent Readiness score of 25.5 (agent-aware), scored by API Evangelist on 2026-11-06.

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/idwall"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/idwall/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/idwall/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.