Brazil
Providers using this tag (133)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 44 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 43 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Brazil” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 126 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Brazil, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 62.9 | 61.2 | +1.7 | 126 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 | 23.4 | +0.4 | 126 |
| Operational Transparency | 13.6 | 14 | -0.4 | 126 |
| Access Clarity | 24.8 | 26.5 | -1.7 | 126 |
| Contract Governance | 4.6 | 6.4 | -1.8 | 126 |
| Contract Quality | 15.1 | 19.8 | -4.7 | 126 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 72.3
- 2 FaturaPDF — Brazilian Invoice & Receipt PDF API 56.2
- 3 Conta Azul 54.4
- 4 Unico 54.2
- 5 Hotmart 52.9
- 6 Koin 51.5
- 7 Grade 51.4
- 8 Kushki 51.1
- 9 Mercado Pago 51
- 10 CloudWalk 50.9
- 1 Nova Lima 46.4
- 2 Malga 38.2
- 3 Conta Azul 37.9
- 4 EditalMD 37.6
- 5 Koin 36.4
- 6 180 Insurance 36.2
- 7 Grade 35.1
- 8 FaturaPDF — Brazilian Invoice & Receipt PDF API 34.7
- 9 Madeiramadeira 34
- 10 Stark Bank 33.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.