Banking as a Service
Providers using this tag (72)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (27)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Banking as a Service” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 69 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Banking as a Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.5 | 23.4 | +15.1 | 69 |
| Contract Quality | 32.9 | 20.1 | +12.8 | 69 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.9 | 14 | +9.9 | 69 |
| Discoverability | 69.2 | 61 | +8.2 | 69 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 6.5 | +3.4 | 69 |
| Access Clarity | 27.1 | 26.5 | +0.6 | 69 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 13% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 72.3
- 2 Highnote 71.8
- 3 SoFi Technologies 60
- 4 Weavr 59.4
- 5 NovoPayment 58.9
- 6 Algbra 55.4
- 7 Lithic 55.3
- 8 Jiko 55.1
- 9 The Bank of London 54.5
- 10 Griffin 54.3
- 1 SoFi Technologies 52.6
- 2 Modulr 49.7
- 3 Weavr 46.7
- 4 Fifth Third Bancorp 43.7
- 5 Customers Bank 43.6
- 6 lemon.markets 41.5
- 7 Lead Bank 40.9
- 8 The Bank of London 39.3
- 9 Algbra 38.7
- 10 Uzum 38.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.