Embedded Finance
Providers using this tag (178)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 45 Limited public surface area
Emerging 40 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 37 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Embedded Finance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
178 providers carry this tag directly, and 281 counting the 5 narrower tags below — 103 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 173 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embedded Finance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.7 | 23.2 | +11.5 | 173 |
| Contract Quality | 26.5 | 17.6 | +8.9 | 173 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.2 | 13.7 | +7.5 | 173 |
| Discoverability | 64.9 | 58.1 | +6.8 | 173 |
| Access Clarity | 31.7 | 26.5 | +5.2 | 173 |
| Contract Governance | 7.4 | 6.3 | +1.1 | 173 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 12% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 4% | 14% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Resolve 62.1
- 2 Airwallex 61.6
- 3 Modulr 49.7
- 4 Lili 48.6
- 5 Weavr 46.7
- 6 Lightspark 46.2
- 7 ChargeAfter 45.9
- 8 Fifth Third Bancorp 43.7
- 9 Customers Bank 43.6
- 10 Uphold 42.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.