Embedded Finance
Providers using this tag (175)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 50 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 35 Limited public surface area
Emerging 38 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 37 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Embedded Finance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 170 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embedded Finance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.8 | 23.4 | +11.4 | 170 |
| Contract Quality | 27.3 | 19.8 | +7.5 | 170 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.9 | 14 | +6.9 | 170 |
| Discoverability | 67.2 | 61.2 | +6 | 170 |
| Access Clarity | 30.3 | 26.5 | +3.8 | 170 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.4 | +1.2 | 170 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Airwallex 91.4
- 2 Highnote 71.8
- 3 Lightspark 70.3
- 4 Uphold 68
- 5 Lili 64.5
- 6 Finix Payments 62.2
- 7 Resolve 60.6
- 8 Weavr 59.3
- 9 Moov 58.9
- 10 Kota 58.1
- 1 ChargeAfter 56.9
- 2 Modulr 49.7
- 3 Airwallex 49
- 4 Lili 48.6
- 5 Resolve 48
- 6 Weavr 46.7
- 7 Lightspark 46.2
- 8 Klutch 44.1
- 9 Fifth Third Bancorp 43.7
- 10 Customers Bank 43.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.