DCAT
Providers using this tag (183)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
data.gov.au FederalEssex Open DataOpen Data Schleswig-HolsteinTransport for NSW Open Data HubYukon Open DataCalderdale Data WorksCalifornia Health and Human ServicesCalifornia Natural Resources AgencyCalifornia Open Datadata.overheid.nlDatenregister BerlinNSW Government Open Dataopen NRWopendata.swissUK Government Open Data
Minimal 166 Almost no public developer surface
Analyze Bostondata.gov.uk CKAN Publishing ServiceDonnees Ouvertes MontrealDonnees QuebecGreece National Data PortalLondon DatastoreMontréal, QuébecNASA Open DataNHS Scotland Open DataOfficial Ukrainian Government PortalOpen Development CambodiaOpen Development MekongOpen Development MyanmarOpen Development VietnamQueensland Government DataTransparency Portal for the City of Karlsruhe, GermanyAlbertaAmeriGEOSS Community PlatformAragón Open DataAvoindata.fiBarnet Open DataBC Data CatalogueBienvenido a OpenData UGRBODIK ODCSBritish Columbia (DataBC)Buenos Aires DataCity of Milan Open DataCity of San JoseCity of Toronto Open DataDados abertos Distrito FederalDados Abertos POADados RSDATA GO JPData Mill North (Leeds)Data.gov InventoryDATA.GOV.HKdata.gov.iedata.gov.lvdata.sa.gov.au South Australiadata.zagreb.hr Official Open Data PortalDataVic Victoriadati.emilia-romagna.itdati.gov.itDatos abiertosDatos Abiertos ACUMARDatos Abiertos ARSATDatos Abiertos BogotaDatos Abiertos Salud ArgentinaDatos Agricultura ArgentinaDatos ArgentinaDatos Energia ArgentinaDatos Provincia de MisionesDatos Transporte ArgentinaDatos Turismo y Deportes Argentinadatos.gob.mx - Sitio oficial de datos abiertos del Gobierno de la Repúblicadatos.gub.uy - Catálogo de Datos Abiertosdatos.misiones.gov.arDOE NETL Energy Data Exchangee-Gov Data CatalogENERGYDATA.infoEUDAT B2FINDFortaleza Dados AbertosGifu Prefecture Open DataGouvernement ouvert Canada (FR)gov.ilGovData DeutschlandGovData GermanyGoverno Aberto do Estado de São PauloHawaii Open Data PortalIATI RegistryLeeds Data MillMadrid Region Open DataMedicaid Open DataMilwaukee Open DataMontpellier Open DataNiagara Open DataNorthern Territory Open DataOklahomaOntario Data CatalogueOpen Data Regione ToscanaOpen Data TrentinoOpen Government Canadaopendata.gov.jeOpenData.HRO - Portal für offene Data der Hansestadt RostockOpenDataNI (Northern Ireland)OPSI SloveniaPortal Datos Abiertos Ayuntamiento de MálagaPortal de Dados Abertos da Cidade de São PauloPortal de Dados Abertos – Prefeitura de Belo HorizontePortal de Dados Urbanos PPGAU UFF - Open data portal for Urban ResarchPortal de Datos Abiertos Republica DominicanaPortal oficial Ayuntamiento de Rivas VaciamadridPortale Dati aperti del Comune di MateraQueensland Geoscience DataRecife City Open DataSan Bernardino County ATC OpenDataSatu Data AcehSatu Data Bencana Indonesia (BNPB)Satu Data Kalimantan TimurSatu Data Semarang RegencySpatial Hub ScotlandTokyo Metropolitan Open DataUS Small Business Administration Open DataVirginia Open DataWestern Australia Data CatalogueYokohama City Open DataOpolskie Open DataZurich Open DataMontenegro Open DataHumanitarian Data ExchangePakistan Open DataAcre Open DataBahia Blanca Open DataBahia Open DataEntre Rios Open DataEspirito Santo Open DataEthiopia Open DataLazio Open DataLeipzig Open DataLiguria Open DataMendoza Open DataMessina Open DataModena Open DataNaples Open DataPernambuco Open DataRondonia Open DataSanta Catarina Open Datadata.gov.hrdataset.gov.md (Portalul Datelor Deschise)LAMMA Toscana Open DataIreland Open Data CatalogueKozadat Hungary Open DataLecce Open DataLisbon Open DataMontenegro Open Data (data.gov.me)Neolaiacampus Open DataUmbria Region Open DataBoxxApps Open DataCali Open DataCompanies Registration Office Open DataConsip Open DataCork City Open Datadata.gov.mkGenoa Open DataIncheon Open DataIrish Agriculture Open DataIrish Housing Open DataKildare County Council Open DataLimerick Open Data CatalogueMaggioli Cloud Open DataMontevideo Open DataNBCO Open DataNCSE Open DataRimini Open DataRome Open DataSmartDublin Open DataSonora Open DataSouth Tyrol Civis Open DataSouth Tyrol Retecivica DataTeagasc Open DataTrento Open DataTurin Open DataTusla Child & Family Agency Open DataUniversity of Bologna Open Datadata.gov.rsUPM YODA Open Data Portal
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
HealthData.gov Catalog APIThe HealthData.gov Catalog API uses CKAN and provides machine-readable access to the HHS health data catalo...NGED Connected Data DCAT CatalogueMachine-readable DCAT catalogue exports of the entire NGED Connected Data Portal, linked from the footer of...Open Spatial Data Portal (Esri ArcGIS Hub tenancy)TENANT RELATIONSHIP. An Esri ArcGIS Hub site publishing University of Melbourne campus GIS layers — buildin...Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center (WPRDC) CKAN APIWPRDC is a regional open data portal led by the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) at ...Department of State Open Data CatalogThe Department's Project Open Data catalog, served as a single machine-readable DCAT-US 3.0 document at htt...
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Sapienza Library System Open Data & Linked Data (dormant)Open-data and linked-data publishing project of the Sistema Bibliotecario Sapienza, on the institution's ow...UniversiDATA DCAT Catalog APIDCAT catalogue endpoint of UniversiDATA, addressed per participating university by acronym. The UCM catalog...UNC GIS Open Data Hub (ArcGIS Hub DCAT-US)UNC-Chapel Hill's campus open-data site for geospatial and institutional datasets, published through ArcGIS...
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “DCAT” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Complutense University of Madrid
Department of State
HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services)
National Grid Electricity Distribution
Sapienza University of Rome
University of Melbourne
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Pittsburgh
Score breakdown
Frequency
61.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
9.5
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
97.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
CKAN 181 co-occurrences
Data Catalog 182 co-occurrences
Government Data 167 co-occurrences
JSON 176 co-occurrences
Catalog 186 co-occurrences
Open Data 191 co-occurrences
Open Data Portal 53 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag183
Api tag8
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Open Data Portals (CKAN / DCAT) | 63% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 182 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged DCAT, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
182
of 183 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
9
-13.2 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
1.1
-10.9 vs catalog 12
Spread
5.7–40.3
median 9.1 · σ 3.3
How the 182 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 1Thin 1Emerging 15Minimal 165
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 63.5 | 57.9 | +5.6 | 182 |
| Contract Governance | 0.4 | 6.5 | -6.1 | 182 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.6 | 13 | -8.4 | 182 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10.4 | 23.2 | -12.8 | 182 |
| Contract Quality | 0.5 | 17.2 | -16.7 | 182 |
| Access Clarity | 4.3 | 23.9 | -19.6 | 182 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 13% | -13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 12% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 16% | -15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Bureau of Land Management 40.3
- 2 Politecnico di Milano 27.8
- 3 data.gov.au Federal 24.9
- 4 Essex Open Data 11.9
- 5 Open Data Schleswig-Holstein 11.9
- 6 Transport for NSW Open Data Hub 11.9
- 7 Yukon Open Data 11.9
- 8 Calderdale Data Works 11.4
- 9 California Health and Human Services 11.4
- 10 California Natural Resources Agency 11.4
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Bureau of Land Management 41.3
- 2 Politecnico di Milano 26.3
- 3 data.gov.au Federal 23.2
- 4 Essex Open Data 0.6
- 5 Open Data Schleswig-Holstein 0.6
- 6 Transport for NSW Open Data Hub 0.6
- 7 Yukon Open Data 0.6
- 8 Calderdale Data Works 0.6
- 9 California Health and Human Services 0.6
- 10 California Natural Resources Agency 0.6
All 183 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 182 carry a score (99%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 180 of 182 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 180 of 182 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.