Data Catalog
Providers using this tag (215)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 143 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 45 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (17)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Catalog” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
215 providers carry this tag directly, and 219 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 4 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 213 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Catalog, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 58.1 | +5.7 | 213 |
| Operational Transparency | 15 | 13.7 | +1.3 | 213 |
| Access Clarity | 24.7 | 26.5 | -1.8 | 213 |
| Contract Governance | 2.2 | 6.3 | -4.1 | 213 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 15.1 | 23.2 | -8.1 | 213 |
| Contract Quality | 6 | 17.6 | -11.6 | 213 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Microsoft Purview 66.8
- 2 Databricks 65.3
- 3 Talend 63
- 4 Amazon DataZone 56.9
- 5 DataHub 56.9
- 6 Lakekeeper 55.3
- 7 BigID 54.7
- 8 Bigeye 52.5
- 9 Decube 51.4
- 10 Informatica 50.2
- 1 data.world 56
- 2 Informatica 54.4
- 3 Talend 51.9
- 4 Databricks 51.5
- 5 DataHub 51.4
- 6 Collate 45.3
- 7 Lakekeeper 42.6
- 8 Bigeye 33.6
- 9 OpenMetadata 32.7
- 10 Microsoft Purview 31.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.