Government Data
Providers using this tag (208)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
sapjilcodingU.S. Treasury Fiscal Datadata.gov.au FederalDBnomicsUSAspending.govUSDA SNAP Retailer LocatorData.govEssex Open DataOpen Data Schleswig-HolsteinTransport for NSW Open Data HubYukon Open DataKinsideCalderdale Data WorksCalifornia Health and Human ServicesCalifornia Natural Resources AgencyCalifornia Open Datadata.overheid.nlDatenregister BerlinNSW Government Open Dataopen NRWopendata.swissUK Government Open Data
Minimal 159 Almost no public developer surface
Queensland Government DataInternational Trade CommissionAnalyze Bostondata.gov.uk CKAN Publishing ServiceDonnees Ouvertes MontrealDonnees QuebecGreece National Data PortalLondon DatastoreMontréal, QuébecNASA Open DataNHS Scotland Open DataOfficial Ukrainian Government PortalTransparency Portal for the City of Karlsruhe, GermanyAlbertaAragón Open DataAvoindata.fiBarnet Open DataBC Data CatalogueBienvenido a OpenData UGRBritish Columbia (DataBC)Buenos Aires DataCity of Milan Open DataCity of San JoseCity of Toronto Open DataDados abertos Distrito FederalDados Abertos POADados RSDATA GO JPData Mill North (Leeds)Data.gov InventoryDATA.GOV.HKdata.gov.iedata.gov.lvdata.sa.gov.au South Australiadata.zagreb.hr Official Open Data PortalDataVic Victoriadati.emilia-romagna.itdati.gov.itDatos abiertosDatos Abiertos ACUMARDatos Abiertos ARSATDatos Abiertos BogotaDatos Abiertos Salud ArgentinaDatos Agricultura ArgentinaDatos ArgentinaDatos Energia ArgentinaDatos Provincia de MisionesDatos Transporte ArgentinaDatos Turismo y Deportes Argentinadatos.gob.mx - Sitio oficial de datos abiertos del Gobierno de la Repúblicadatos.gub.uy - Catálogo de Datos Abiertosdatos.misiones.gov.arDOE NETL Energy Data Exchangee-Gov Data CatalogFortaleza Dados AbertosGifu Prefecture Open DataGouvernement ouvert Canada (FR)gov.ilGovData DeutschlandGovData GermanyGoverno Aberto do Estado de São PauloHawaii Open Data PortalIATI RegistryLeeds Data MillMadrid Region Open DataMedicaid Open DataMilwaukee Open DataMontpellier Open DataNiagara Open DataNorthern Territory Open DataOklahomaOntario Data CatalogueOpen Data Regione ToscanaOpen Data TrentinoOpen Government Canadaopendata.gov.jeOpenData.HRO - Portal für offene Data der Hansestadt RostockOpenDataNI (Northern Ireland)OPSI SloveniaPortal Datos Abiertos Ayuntamiento de MálagaPortal de Dados Abertos da Cidade de São PauloPortal de Dados Abertos – Prefeitura de Belo HorizontePortal de Dados Urbanos PPGAU UFF - Open data portal for Urban ResarchPortal de Datos Abiertos Republica DominicanaPortal oficial Ayuntamiento de Rivas VaciamadridPortale Dati aperti del Comune di MateraQueensland Geoscience DataRecife City Open DataSan Bernardino County ATC OpenDataSatu Data AcehSatu Data Bencana Indonesia (BNPB)Satu Data Kalimantan TimurSatu Data Semarang RegencySpatial Hub ScotlandTokyo Metropolitan Open DataUS Small Business Administration Open DataVirginia Open DataWestern Australia Data CatalogueYokohama City Open DataOpolskie Open DataZurich Open DataMontenegro Open DataPakistan Open DataAcre Open DataBahia Blanca Open DataBahia Open DataEntre Rios Open DataEspirito Santo Open DataEthiopia Open Dataisland.is (Digital Iceland)Lazio Open DataLeipzig Open DataLiguria Open DataMendoza Open DataMessina Open DataModena Open DataNaples Open DataPernambuco Open DataRondonia Open DataSanta Catarina Open Datadata.egov.bg (Open Data Portal of Bulgaria)data.gov.hrdataset.gov.md (Portalul Datelor Deschise)LAMMA Toscana Open Dataopendata.rks-gov.net (Kosovo Open Data) [offline]Ireland Open Data CatalogueKozadat Hungary Open DataLecce Open DataLisbon Open DataMontenegro Open Data (data.gov.me)Umbria Region Open Datadata.gov.mt (Open Data Malta)Cali Open DataCompanies Registration Office Open DataConsip Open DataCork City Open Datadata.gov.mkGenoa Open DataIncheon Open DataIrish Agriculture Open DataIrish Housing Open DataKildare County Council Open DataLimerick Open Data CatalogueMontevideo Open DataNBCO Open DataNCSE Open DataRimini Open DataRome Open DataSmartDublin Open DataSonora Open DataSouth Tyrol Civis Open DataSouth Tyrol Retecivica DataTeagasc Open DataTrento Open DataTurin Open DataTusla Child & Family Agency Open Datadata.gov.rsopendata.gov.al (Open Data Albania)FEC
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Government Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
62.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
13.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
81.9
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
Related tags
DCAT 167 co-occurrences
CKAN 165 co-occurrences
Data Catalog 170 co-occurrences
JSON 164 co-occurrences
Open Data 194 co-occurrences
Catalog 175 co-occurrences
Open Data Portal 53 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag208
Api tag3
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag7
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Open Data Portals (CKAN / DCAT) | 77% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 207 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Government Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
207
of 208 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
13.1
-9.1 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
5.5
-6.5 vs catalog 12
Spread
5.4–71.6
median 9.1 · σ 11.2
How the 207 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 3Developing 8Thin 15Emerging 22Minimal 158
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 57.9 | +6.5 | 207 |
| Contract Governance | 2 | 6.5 | -4.5 | 207 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.2 | 13 | -5.8 | 207 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.3 | 23.2 | -8.9 | 207 |
| Contract Quality | 7.5 | 17.2 | -9.7 | 207 |
| Access Clarity | 7.6 | 23.9 | -16.3 | 207 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 16% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Vaquill AI 71.6
- 2 flatin.pt 55.6
- 3 FlightFinder 55.2
- 4 2s 54.5
- 5 ingest0r 46.6
- 6 CMS — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 46.5
- 7 US Census Bureau 45.3
- 8 Mireye 45.1
- 9 Sex Offenders API 44.9
- 10 Osmaura 41.5
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Vaquill AI 67
- 2 Mireye 52.5
- 3 2s 48.5
- 4 OpenLaws 46.4
- 5 FlightFinder 44.4
- 6 ingest0r 41.1
- 7 Sex Offenders API 40.4
- 8 CMS — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 40.1
- 9 ES·pera API 33.7
- 10 flatin.pt 33.2
All 208 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 207 carry a score (100%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 195 of 207 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 195 of 207 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.