Open Data
Providers using this tag (560)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 99 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 150 Limited public surface area
Emerging 201 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 89 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (526)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 115 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 110 Limited public surface area
Emerging 217 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 79 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (76)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Open Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 76 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
560 providers carry this tag directly, and 601 counting the 2 narrower tags below and the 3 beneath them — 41 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 554 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Open Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 64.3 | 58.1 | +6.2 | 554 |
| Contract Quality | 23.6 | 17.6 | +6 | 554 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.7 | 13.7 | +5 | 554 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.3 | +2.3 | 554 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 24.8 | 23.2 | +1.6 | 554 |
| Access Clarity | 27.3 | 26.5 | +0.8 | 554 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 14% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 14% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OpenMercantil 80.6
- 2 OpenSanctions 67.9
- 3 UK Power Networks 61.7
- 4 EPA — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 60.7
- 5 La Poste Groupe 60.5
- 6 Plinth US Grants Data 60.5
- 7 University of Waterloo 60.4
- 8 Open Food Facts 60.1
- 9 GZW Data API 59.7
- 10 flatin.pt 59.4
- 1 Sirenic 70.9
- 2 OpenGov 63.1
- 3 Comunicate.top API 59.8
- 4 data.world 56
- 5 Plinth US Grants Data 54.9
- 6 OpenMercantil 46.6
- 7 Barclays 46.5
- 8 We > Ultrarich 46
- 9 AI Crawler Index 45.6
- 10 FlightFinder 43
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.