Voidly

Internet censorship measurements, incidents, and ISP-level blocking data across 126 countries

Voidly is listed with 1 API on the APIs.io network. Tagged areas include Open Data, Public APIs, and A2A.

Voidly’s developer surface includes engineering blog, support, and 6 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

9.0/100 minimal ▬ flat Agent 13/100 agent aware Front door AI 4/6 moderate Heartbeat 100/100 alive Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-13 · rubric v0.28.0 · Show this score on your site →

1 API 1 MCP Servers

Open Data Public APIs A2A

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-13 · rubric v0.28.0

Composite quality — 9.0/100 · minimal

Contract Quality 0.0 / 21

Developer Ergonomics 2.8 / 17

Access Clarity 0.0 / 17

Operational Transparency 1.0 / 11

Contract Governance 0.0 / 10

Discoverability 4.0 / 9

Regulatory Posture 1.8 / 15

Agent readiness — 13/100 · agent aware

Machine-Readable Contract 0 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 0 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 12 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 0 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7

Typed Event Surface 0 / 6

Agent Skills 0 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 8 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Government & Public Sector regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics could not be measured. We hold no machine-readable contract for this provider to read, so there is nothing to measure a write surface against. Excluded rather than scored zero: never-measured and measured-empty are different facts. Publishing an OpenAPI is what makes this facet — and several others — scorable at all.

The six quality facets above are damped to 85 points between them, because the conditional facet above carries the other 15. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 85% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/voidly/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/voidly/card.svg" alt="Voidly on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

Machine-Readable Contract +18 pts — api_specs includes an OpenAPI document Ask about this →
Agentic Access Contract +10 pts — agentic_access artifact present (x-agentic-access), graded by author Ask about this →
Machine-Readable Auth +10 pts — a served openid-configuration/oauth-authorization-server carrying `issuer` (served), else the securitySchemes class in the provider OpenAPIs — bound (mutualTLS, DPoP, Signature) > negotiable (oauth2 authorizationCode/clientCredentials, openIdConnect) > bearer (http bearer, apiKey) Ask about this →
Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented) Ask about this →
Stable Error Semantics +8 pts — OpenAPI $refs a shared error schema across 4xx/5xx responses (verified), else common[].type includes ErrorCatalog / ErrorCodes / DeclineCodes Ask about this →
Rate-Limit Signaling +7 pts — OpenAPI responses document X-RateLimit-* / RateLimit headers (verified), else a rate_limits artifact or RateLimits link (documented) Ask about this →

11 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Contract Quality scores 0.0 — up to +25.0 composite points Ask about this →
Access Clarity scores 0.0 — up to +20.0 composite points Ask about this →
Developer Ergonomics scores 16.7 — up to +16.7 composite points Ask about this →

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Not sure how this applies to your stack? Ask about any one item. Kin Lane reads every question, looks at your profile and your situation, and replies with what a fix would take — scoped to that one area, priced up front, yours whether you ship it or not. Ask a question →

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/voidly/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/voidly to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Markets this provider is in provisional

The Kin Score Market layer reads a provider inside its market: its position, and how deep its integrations go. Depth is only comparable within a position. Provisional and unweighted: not part of the Kin Score or agent readiness.

Market	Position	Depth	Registered MCP server	Declares compatibility
Browser Extension Stores (company-published Firefox add-ons; Chrome Web Store unreadable)	builds-on	17.2 (thin)	4	1

Registered MCP server and declares compatibility are report only — not weighted. Undeclared means we found nothing we can read, so there is no number: we never infer integrations.

Standards implemented 2

Standards this provider implements or carries. De facto ones are profiled and measured by the API Commons; formal ones come from the standards directory and are linked by the provider's own tags. The evidence column says how each claim was established — not that it was made.

Agent2Agent

measured — observed by APIs.io (flavored)

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

measured — observed by APIs.io (verified)

APIs 1

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

Voidly

Internet censorship measurements, incidents, and ISP-level blocking data across 126 countries

MCP Servers 1

Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.

Voidly MCP Server

Remote MCP server at api.voidly.ai over HTTP; 54 tools listed.

MCP SERVER

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Voidly Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · DNSSEC · DMARC

SECURITY

Voidly Vulnerability Disclosure

security.txt · contact published

SECURITY

Resources

Access & Security 2

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

VulnerabilityDisclosure

VulnerabilityDisclosure

DomainSecurity

DomainSecurity

Operate 1

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Support

Support

Company 3

The organization behind the API

Blog

Blog

BlogRSS

BlogRSS

Website

Website

Other 2

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

AgentCard

AgentCard

PublicAPIsListing

PublicAPIsListing

Source (apis.yml)

aid: voidly
name: Voidly
description: Internet censorship measurements, incidents, and ISP-level blocking data across 126 countries
url: https://voidly.ai/api-docs
deliveryModel:
  model: unknown
  open_source: false
  commercial: false
  callable_host: false
  label: Delivery model not determined — needs a product licence on record
  confidence: low
  source:
  - none
  generated: '2026-08-28'
  method: derived
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  source:
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-13'
  method: derived
specificationVersion: '0.23'
created: '2026-05-28'
modified: '2026-10-06'
x-source: public-apis/public-apis
x-category: Open Data
x-tier: 3
x-tier-reason: bulk-registered-from-public-apis
tags:
- Open Data
- Public APIs
- A2A
apis:
- name: Voidly
  description: Internet censorship measurements, incidents, and ISP-level blocking data across 126 countries
  humanURL: https://voidly.ai/api-docs
  tags:
  - Open Data
  properties:
  - type: Documentation
    url: https://voidly.ai/api-docs
common:
- url: https://voidly.ai/press
  type: Blog
- url: https://voidly.ai/incidents/feed.xml
  type: BlogRSS
- type: AgentCard
  url: a2a/voidly-a2a.yml
  name: A2A Agent Card
  description: Agent Card served at /.well-known/agent-card.json (flavored against A2A 1.0.0).
- type: VulnerabilityDisclosure
  url: security/voidly-vulnerability-disclosure.yml
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/voidly-domain-security.yml
- type: Website
  url: https://voidly.ai/api-docs
- type: PublicAPIsListing
  url: https://github.com/public-apis/public-apis
- type: Support
  url: mailto:support@voidly.ai
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com

Voidly API — frequently asked questions

Does Voidly have an API?

Yes. APIs.io lists 1 API from Voidly, including Voidly.

Does Voidly have an MCP server?

Yes. APIs.io lists 1 MCP server for Voidly: Remote MCP server at api.voidly.ai over HTTP; 54 tools listed.

Is the Voidly API ready for AI agents?

Voidly has a Kin Score of 9.0 out of 100 (minimal) and an Agent Readiness score of 12.8 (agent-aware), scored by API Evangelist on 2026-11-13.

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/voidly"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/voidly/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/voidly/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.