A2A
Agent to Agent ProtocolAgent-to-AgentAgent2AgentAgent CardA2A
Providers using this tag (442)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 68 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 110 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 140 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 71 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (192)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 17 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 29 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 76 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 44 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “A2A” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 436 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged A2A, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 57.1 | 23.3 | +33.8 | 436 |
| Access Clarity | 52.8 | 26.5 | +26.3 | 436 |
| Operational Transparency | 39.4 | 13.8 | +25.6 | 436 |
| Contract Quality | 41.3 | 17.8 | +23.5 | 436 |
| Discoverability | 71.3 | 58 | +13.3 | 436 |
| Contract Governance | 16.6 | 6.3 | +10.3 | 436 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 81% | 15% | +66 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 81% | 13% | +68 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 32% | 12% | +20 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 13% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 91.8
- 2 APIs.io 90.1
- 3 Xquik 88.7
- 4 Customer.io 83.8
- 5 Agoragentic 80.5
- 6 Redocly 79.7
- 7 Kit 78.5
- 8 Relevance AI 78.5
- 9 CData 78
- 10 Ghost 78
- 1 Xquik 91.4
- 2 OneSignal 75.4
- 3 APIs.io 75.3
- 4 Primitive 75.2
- 5 ClosedLoop AI 74.2
- 6 Agent Ready 72.9
- 7 Sirenic 70.9
- 8 Taskfolk 69.2
- 9 Ultravioleta DAO 69.1
- 10 FeedOracle Technologies 68.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.