Agent-Native
Providers using this tag (750)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 128 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 215 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 302 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 99 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (277)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 70 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 116 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 48 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (161)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agent-Native” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 161 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| x402 Micropayments & Agentic Pay-per-Call | 38% |
| AI Agents (A2A agent cards) | 25% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 674 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agent-Native, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 59.8 | 18.2 | +41.6 | 674 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.9 | 22.1 | +30.8 | 674 |
| Access Clarity | 53.1 | 25 | +28.1 | 674 |
| Operational Transparency | 38.8 | 12.4 | +26.4 | 674 |
| Contract Governance | 26.7 | 9.4 | +17.3 | 674 |
| Discoverability | 70.5 | 57.9 | +12.6 | 674 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 65% | 16% | +49 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 62% | 14% | +48 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 48% | 13% | +35 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 97% | 35% | +62 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.