Agents
AGENTAGENTSAgentAgentsagentagents
Providers using this tag (413)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 23 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 57 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 119 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 95 Limited public surface area
Emerging 88 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (685)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 64 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 136 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 224 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 152 Limited public surface area
Emerging 104 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (462)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agents” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 462 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 409 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agents, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.4 | 23.4 | +23 | 409 |
| Access Clarity | 43.6 | 26.5 | +17.1 | 409 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.6 | 14 | +14.6 | 409 |
| Contract Quality | 31.1 | 19.8 | +11.3 | 409 |
| Discoverability | 70.2 | 61.2 | +9 | 409 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.4 | +5.5 | 409 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 56% | 10% | +46 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 60% | 13% | +47 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 11% | +23 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 CarsXE 68.5
- 2 Natural AI 67.6
- 3 Boom Ai 65.8
- 4 Lightfield 65.6
- 5 Parallel 65
- 6 API Evangelist 64.6
- 7 TextQL 63.6
- 8 Duvo Ai 63.1
- 9 Loops 62.9
- 10 Brainfish 62.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.