Agents
AgentAgents
Providers using this tag (722)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 58 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 107 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 181 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 171 Limited public surface area
Emerging 153 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 52 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1142)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 177 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 242 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 319 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 255 Limited public surface area
Emerging 136 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (784)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agents” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 784 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| x402 Micropayments & Agentic Pay-per-Call | 26% |
| AI Model Routing | 23% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 686 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agents, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.2 | 24.5 | +19.7 | 686 |
| Access Clarity | 46.6 | 30 | +16.6 | 686 |
| Contract Quality | 31.9 | 18.6 | +13.3 | 686 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.1 | 13.2 | +11.9 | 686 |
| Discoverability | 68.5 | 59.1 | +9.4 | 686 |
| Contract Governance | 18.9 | 9.7 | +9.2 | 686 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 59% | 18% | +41 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 59% | 16% | +43 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 31% | 13% | +18 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 60% | 36% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 SMKlog 100
- 2 Eventwren 89.7
- 3 Hagglebee 88.4
- 4 Yarnhen 88.4
- 5 Yawplet 88.4
- 6 Anthropic 86.4
- 7 Appwrite 84.6
- 8 ElevenLabs 83.2
- 9 Agoragentic 81.4
- 10 Kit 80.4
- 1 Yarnhen 81.2
- 2 Yawplet 81.2
- 3 SMKlog 79.7
- 4 Eventwren 75
- 5 Hagglebee 75
- 6 Agent Ready 74.4
- 7 Natural AI 71
- 8 CarsXE 69.1
- 9 Loops 69
- 10 sendmux-ai 67.8
Coverage caveat. 442 of 686 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.