Artificial Intelligence
AIArtificial Intelligence
Providers using this tag (3850)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 42 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 157 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 489 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 581 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1156 Early or largely undocumented
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,156 by rating. See them all →
Minimal 1412 Almost no public developer surface
Showing the top 1,000 of 1,412 by rating. See them all →
APIs with this tag (567)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 97 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 78 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 128 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 155 Limited public surface area
Emerging 102 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (195)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Artificial Intelligence” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 195 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
3850 providers carry this tag directly, and 4172 or more counting the 15 narrower tags below and the 9 beneath them — 890 more to reach. A count here is a floor: one of these tags holds more members than are listed.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 3653 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Artificial Intelligence, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.4 | 26.5 | +2.9 | 3653 |
| Discoverability | 58.5 | 58.1 | +0.4 | 3653 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.3 | -0.4 | 3653 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.5 | 23.2 | -0.7 | 3653 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.3 | 13.7 | -1.4 | 3653 |
| Contract Quality | 14.2 | 17.6 | -3.4 | 3653 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 14% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 14% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 91
- 2 OpenAI 84.8
- 3 Ada 84.4
- 4 Snowflake 82.7
- 5 Redocly 82.6
- 6 ElevenLabs 81.8
- 7 Cloudflare 80.6
- 8 Anthropic 79.4
- 9 Adobe Suite 78.3
- 10 Amazon Lex 78.1
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 Cloudflare 72.5
- 3 Natural AI 71.2
- 4 Feedly 66.9
- 5 AutoContent API 65.9
- 6 Scope3 65.8
- 7 Lightfield 65.6
- 8 Parallel 65
- 9 Bria 65
- 10 WebScraping.AI 65
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.