emerging · -0.1 capabilitymarket actiondomain

Fine-Tuning

Score 23.4 / 100 25 providers +18 via APIs 25 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Information & Data Management 1

Providers using this tag (25)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (25)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area

Companies reaching this through an API (18)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fine-Tuning” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

AI Gateway Cohere Crusoe DeepInfra Google Gemini Groq Kimi (Moonshot AI) LiteLLM Microsoft Azure Mistral AI OpenAI Portkey Prime Intellect SiliconFlow Surge AI Telnyx Together AI University of Amsterdam

Score breakdown

Frequency
50.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
41.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
15.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Artificial Intelligence broader

Related tags

Completions 11 co-occurrences Inference 23 co-occurrences Embeddings 19 co-occurrences Model Training 7 co-occurrences Responses 8 co-occurrences Assistant 8 co-occurrences OpenAI-Compatible 9 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag25
Api tag25
Openapi tag11
Openapi op tag68

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 24 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fine-Tuning, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
24
all scored
Mean Kin Score
37.8
+13.8 vs catalog 24
Mean Agent Readiness
20.5
+8.1 vs catalog 12.4
Spread
10–67.2
median 38.8 · σ 15.5
How the 24 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 3Developing 8Thin 6Emerging 5Minimal 1
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 48.9 23.4 +25.5 24
Contract Quality 36.2 20.1 +16.1 24
Operational Transparency 28.4 14 +14.4 24
Access Clarity 36.2 26.5 +9.7 24
Discoverability 70.4 61 +9.4 24
Contract Governance 8.3 6.5 +1.8 24

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 25% 10% +15
MCP server (first-party) 33% 13% +20
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 13% 11% +2
Security 100% 96% +4
Arazzo workflows 8% 2% +6
Governance rules 21% 13% +8

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Segmind 67.2
  2. 2 Seekr 61.3
  3. 3 Refuel 60.4
  4. 4 ChatGPT 59.7
  5. 5 Simplismart 51
  6. 6 Fastino Labs 47.7
  7. 7 AI21 Labs 43.6
  8. 8 Argilla 43.6
  9. 9 FlexAI 43.3
  10. 10 Understudy Labs 43.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Fastino Labs 52
  2. 2 Fireworks AI 35.9
  3. 3 Seekr 35.8
  4. 4 ChatGPT 32.7
  5. 5 Refuel 32.2
  6. 6 Segmind 30.6
  7. 7 Understudy Labs 28.9
  8. 8 Oxen 27.8
  9. 9 Simplismart 26.1
  10. 10 FlexAI 26.1
All 25 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 20 September 2026, across 27620 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/fine-tuning"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/fine-tuning"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/fine-tuning/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.