Fine-Tuning
Fine TuningFine-TuningFine-tuningFineTuningFinetuningfine-tuning
Providers using this tag (41)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 41 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fine-Tuning, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 43.1 | 17.5 | +25.6 | 41 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.3 | 17.9 | +23.4 | 41 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.1 | 11.3 | +13.8 | 41 |
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 60.4 | +10.8 | 41 |
| Access Clarity | 30.9 | 22.3 | +8.6 | 41 |
| Contract Governance | 10.7 | 6.4 | +4.3 | 41 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 16% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 7% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 9% | -2 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 13% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Refuel 64.6
- 2 OpenAI 64.2
- 3 Seekr 61.3
- 4 Crusoe 60.6
- 5 ChatGPT 59.8
- 6 Prime Intellect 55.1
- 7 Simplismart 53.3
- 8 Fastino Labs 51.5
- 9 Portkey 51.3
- 10 Understudy Labs 47
- 1 Fastino Labs 54.2
- 2 Refuel 41.8
- 3 Crusoe 40.3
- 4 Telnyx 38.8
- 5 OpenAI 37.7
- 6 Portkey 36
- 7 Seekr 35.8
- 8 ChatGPT 34.7
- 9 Fireworks AI 33.7
- 10 Together AI 33.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.