Embeddings
EmbeddingEmbeddings
Providers using this tag (47)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (125)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 56 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (76)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Embeddings” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 76 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embeddings, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.6 | 17.6 | +28 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.7 | 23.2 | +24.5 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 34.8 | 13.7 | +21.1 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 45.9 | 26.5 | +19.4 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 69.1 | 58.1 | +11 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.3 | +3.1 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 14% | +18 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 12% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 40% | 14% | +26 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Hugging Face 68
- 2 AIMLAPI 65.2
- 3 Pexafy 64.2
- 4 Perplexity 57
- 5 Pinecone 55.8
- 6 Mixedbread 55.5
- 7 Vectara 54.8
- 8 RightNow AI 53.1
- 9 Pixeltable 53
- 10 SambaNova Systems 52.7
- 1 Perplexity 60.4
- 2 Pexafy 56.3
- 3 AIMLAPI 55.1
- 4 Mixedbread 52.1
- 5 DocuSeal 37.3
- 6 Hugging Face 36.9
- 7 Felt 35.4
- 8 Chroma 34.2
- 9 Novita AI 33.9
- 10 Pinecone 33.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.