Typed Decision Models
Frontier, converging by imitation. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- Providers' own OpenAPI, JSON Schema, apis.yml and compatibility evidence machine-readable
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 11 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | LLM 45%, MCP 27%, A2A 27%, Cloud 27%, Inference 27%, Foundation Models 27%, Embeddings 27%, Decision Support 27%, Structured Outputs 27% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | LLM 73%, MCP 64%, Infrastructure 27%, Generative AI 27%, RAG 27%, Foundation Models 27% |
| Industries | Artificial Intelligence 91% |
| Areas | Machine Learning 18% |
| Capabilities | Information & Data Management 64%, Cybersecurity Management 36%, Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 27%, Information Technology Management 27% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Gateway | 46.0 | 31 | 0 / 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | coverage 100% |
covered 5 · reached mainly through aggregators
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services | 62.6 | 729 | 0 / 729 | 0 | 690 | 1 | standard 1%, covered 4%, builds-on-platform 2%, distribution 92% |
| Microsoft Azure AI Foundry | 51.8 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | covered 100% |
| Perplexity | 51.8 | 17 | 0 / 17 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ipaas-bridge 24%, covered 35%, builds-on-platform 35%, unknown 6% |
| Upstage | 47.9 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | covered 67%, builds-on-platform 17%, distribution 17% |
| Ollama | 37.8 | 8 | 0 / 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 12%, covered 62%, builds-on-platform 12%, unknown 12% |
standard 1 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venice.ai | 35.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 25%, distribution 50% |
mixed 4 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | 61.4 | 34 | 0 / 34 | 1 | 5 | 0 | contract 12%, standard 29%, covered 15%, builds-on-platform 26%, distribution 15%, unknown 3% |
| OpenAI | 55.6 | 73 | 0 / 73 | 1 | 6 | 35 | ipaas-bridge 49%, contract 4%, standard 10%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 10%, distribution 8%, unknown 1% |
| Telnyx | 51.2 | 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 | 5 | 3 | provider-built 14%, ipaas-bridge 14%, standard 10%, coverage 10%, covered 10%, builds-on-platform 19%, distribution 24% |
| TypeSafe AI | 42.2 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 11%, standard 22%, covered 33%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 22% |
Frontier timeline DRAFT · report only — not weighted
2026-10-12 anchor shape: typesafe-ai
- Shape gravity: 4 providers declare compatibility with the typesafe-ai shape in their own contracts.
- Compatible shape adopters: cloudflare, llmgateway-io, ollama, telnyx
- Follows the anchor's documentation only: amazon-web-services
- Resemblance only (not compatibility): azure-ai-foundry
- Providers in the snapshot: 10 · by path: decisions 3, systemone 7, workers-ai-run-model 1
- Publishing calibration: 0
2026-10-13 anchor shape: typesafe-ai
- Shape gravity: 4 providers declare compatibility with the typesafe-ai shape in their own contracts.
- Compatible shape adopters: cloudflare, llmgateway-io, ollama, telnyx
- Follows the anchor's documentation only: amazon-web-services
- Resemblance only (not compatibility): azure-ai-foundry
- Providers in the snapshot: 10 · by path: decisions 3, systemone 7, workers-ai-run-model 1
- Publishing calibration: 0
2026-10-15 anchor shape: typesafe-ai
- Shape gravity: 4 providers declare compatibility with the typesafe-ai shape in their own contracts.
- Compatible shape adopters: cloudflare, llmgateway-io, ollama, telnyx
- Follows the anchor's documentation only: amazon-web-services
- Resemblance only (not compatibility): azure-ai-foundry
- Providers in the snapshot: 11 · by path: decisions 4, systemone 8, workers-ai-run-model 1
- Publishing calibration: 0
2026-10-17 anchor shape: typesafe-ai
- Shape gravity: 6 providers declare compatibility with the typesafe-ai shape in their own contracts.
- Compatible shape adopters: cloudflare, llmgateway-io, ollama, opper, telenor-sverige, telnyx
- Follows the anchor's documentation only: amazon-web-services
- Resemblance only (not compatibility): azure-ai-foundry
- Providers in the snapshot: 14 · by path: decisions 7, systemone 10, workers-ai-run-model 1
- Publishing calibration: 0
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.