Cloud
Cloudcloud
Providers using this tag (285)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 31 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 70 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 63 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 46 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 9 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (193)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 45 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 47 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 58 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (103)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 103 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 260 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.1 | 23.4 | +14.7 | 260 |
| Contract Quality | 33.5 | 19.8 | +13.7 | 260 |
| Access Clarity | 36.8 | 26.5 | +10.3 | 260 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.8 | 13.9 | +8.9 | 260 |
| Contract Governance | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | 260 |
| Discoverability | 64.2 | 61.2 | +3 | 260 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 10% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 13% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 14% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 87.5
- 2 Microsoft Azure 73.3
- 3 Azure Kubernetes Service 72.2
- 4 Qlik Sense 70.5
- 5 Orange Business 70.1
- 6 Microsoft Azure Functions 68.6
- 7 Salesforce Service Cloud APIs 68.6
- 8 Infor 67.8
- 9 Netlify 67.3
- 10 Cloudflare 65.1
- 1 Netlify 62.2
- 2 Optilogic 54.9
- 3 Upsun 54.5
- 4 Red Hat 50.1
- 5 Salesforce 49.6
- 6 Cloudflare 49.6
- 7 Sweep 48.5
- 8 Salesforce Service Cloud APIs 47.2
- 9 NexGen Cloud 47.2
- 10 Google Cloud Logging 46.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.