Compute
Providers using this tag (103)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (67)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (41)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Compute” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 95 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Compute, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.9 | 24.5 | +21.4 | 95 |
| Contract Quality | 37.9 | 18.6 | +19.3 | 95 |
| Access Clarity | 44.7 | 30 | +14.7 | 95 |
| Operational Transparency | 26 | 13.2 | +12.8 | 95 |
| Discoverability | 67.6 | 59.1 | +8.5 | 95 |
| Contract Governance | 16.5 | 9.7 | +6.8 | 95 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 18% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 1% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 69% | 36% | +33 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Lightsail 76.4
- 2 Microsoft Azure Functions 76.2
- 3 Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling 75.6
- 4 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 75.6
- 5 Amazon EC2 71
- 6 NexGen Cloud 69.8
- 7 Google Cloud Batch 69.4
- 8 Microsoft Azure Batch 68.6
- 9 Edge Network 67.8
- 10 Amazon Deadline Cloud 67
- 1 The San Francisco Compute Company 55.9
- 2 Blaxel 53.7
- 3 AWS Batch 51.5
- 4 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 50
- 5 Agentgates 49.9
- 6 Vultr 49.8
- 7 Amazon EC2 46.3
- 8 Amazon Deadline Cloud 45.5
- 9 Digital Ocean 44.6
- 10 AmpleRun 43.7
Coverage caveat. 59 of 95 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.