Cloud Computing
Providers using this tag (56)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud Computing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud Computing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.4 | 23.2 | +29.2 | 49 |
| Access Clarity | 46.1 | 26.5 | +19.6 | 49 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.8 | 13.7 | +17.1 | 49 |
| Contract Quality | 33.1 | 17.6 | +15.5 | 49 |
| Contract Governance | 13.8 | 6.3 | +7.5 | 49 |
| Discoverability | 65.5 | 58.1 | +7.4 | 49 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 14% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 12% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 18% | 2% | +16 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 76.4
- 2 Microsoft Azure 76.2
- 3 IBM 69.1
- 4 Amazon GameLift 65.4
- 5 Databricks 65.3
- 6 Amazon EC2 63.7
- 7 Google Cloud Platform 62.9
- 8 Mithril 60.4
- 9 Cerebras Systems 59.1
- 10 Amazon HealthOmics 57.7
- 1 Databricks 51.5
- 2 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 49.3
- 3 Microsoft Azure 48.4
- 4 Linode 44.6
- 5 Google Cloud Platform 42.3
- 6 NewTqnia | Technology News, AI and Innovation 41.9
- 7 Amazon GameLift 37.1
- 8 IBM 36.3
- 9 Mithril 33.9
- 10 Amazon HealthOmics 33.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.