Cloud Computing
Providers using this tag (61)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud Computing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud Computing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 54.5 | 23.4 | +31.1 | 54 |
| Access Clarity | 44.8 | 26.5 | +18.3 | 54 |
| Contract Quality | 37.9 | 19.8 | +18.1 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.6 | 14 | +17.6 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 13.9 | 6.4 | +7.5 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 67.3 | 61.2 | +6.1 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 10% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 13% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 93% | 97% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 18% | 2% | +16 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 14% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 78.2
- 2 Microsoft Azure 73.3
- 3 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 71.1
- 4 Oracle Platforms 69.5
- 5 Amazon HealthLake 62.9
- 6 Amazon EC2 62.8
- 7 Amazon HealthOmics 61.3
- 8 Cerebras Systems 60.4
- 9 IBM 60
- 10 Google Cloud Platform 59.4
- 1 Microsoft Azure 46.2
- 2 Oracle Platforms 45
- 3 NewTqnia | Technology News, AI and Innovation 44.4
- 4 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 42.5
- 5 Google Cloud Platform 42.3
- 6 Databricks 40.1
- 7 IBM 37.3
- 8 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 37.2
- 9 Crusoe 35.6
- 10 Advanced Micro Devices 34
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.