Enterprise
Providers using this tag (602)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 21 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 45 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 111 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 81 Limited public surface area
Emerging 159 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 177 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 8 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (168)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 16 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 32 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 50 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (103)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Enterprise” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 103 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 533 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Enterprise, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 31 | 23.2 | +7.8 | 533 |
| Access Clarity | 33.7 | 26.5 | +7.2 | 533 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.7 | 13.7 | +7 | 533 |
| Contract Quality | 22.3 | 17.6 | +4.7 | 533 |
| Discoverability | 61.3 | 58.1 | +3.2 | 533 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.3 | +3.1 | 533 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 14% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 14% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 91
- 2 Losant 83.1
- 3 Svix 76.7
- 4 Microsoft Azure 76.2
- 5 Treasure Data 76.2
- 6 ThousandEyes 75
- 7 Jitterbit 74
- 8 Microsoft Azure API Management 72.9
- 9 Veeva 72.8
- 10 Qlik Sense 72
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.