Automation
AutomationsAutomation
Providers using this tag (534)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 24 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 50 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 89 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 80 Limited public surface area
Emerging 119 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 171 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (349)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 59 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 68 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 101 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 81 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (211)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Automation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 211 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 504 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 35.2 | 26.5 | +8.7 | 504 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.6 | 23.2 | +6.4 | 504 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.6 | 13.7 | +4.9 | 504 |
| Contract Quality | 22.2 | 17.6 | +4.6 | 504 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.3 | +2.7 | 504 |
| Discoverability | 59.9 | 58.1 | +1.8 | 504 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 14% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 12% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 14% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tray.ai 89.3
- 2 Xquik 88.7
- 3 Dynatrace 86.3
- 4 Ada 84.4
- 5 GitHub Actions 82.8
- 6 Brevo 81.7
- 7 Postman 79.6
- 8 Kit 78.5
- 9 Adobe Suite 78.3
- 10 Salesforce Marketing Cloud 77.3
- 1 Xquik 91.4
- 2 Leadping 66.5
- 3 Zapier 66
- 4 AutoContent API 65.9
- 5 Canva 63.3
- 6 Tray.ai 62.9
- 7 Adobe Suite 62.3
- 8 Relm 62.2
- 9 Duvo Ai 61
- 10 Kit 60.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.