Airtable Marketplace (extension builders)
Platform market (airtable marketplace extension register; builders ranked). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- Airtable Marketplace (airtable.com/marketplace; v0.3/blocksGallery/publishedBlocks, the page's own public JSON) machine-readable, 205 listed extensions (203 in sitemap.xml); 12 partner-built edges -> 12 providers; 44 Airtable-built held; 119 builders unlinked (individuals, free-mail, not in catalog)
- Airtable sitemap (www.airtable.com/sitemap.xml) machine-readable, enumeration cross-check only: 203 /marketplace/blk... extension URLs, 4 category pages; no integration listing URLs
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Business Process Automation 44%, AI Agents 20%, Automation 20% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | MCP 32%, Workflow Automation 32%, Documents 24% |
| Industries | Artificial Intelligence 28%, Marketing & Advertising 20% |
| Areas | Workflow Automation 24%, AI Automation 20%, Communications 12% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
undeclared 25 · declares nothing we can read: no number
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AppliedAI (AAICO) | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Airtable | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Carbone | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Cflow | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ClickSend | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| CraftMyPDF | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| DataForSEO | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Documint | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fillout | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Identify Software | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Image API | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Integrately | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| involve.me | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Istante | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Lob | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Luminai | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| MailerSend | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Maisa | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| PDF Generator API | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Pointee | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| QuickChart | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| ReadSoft | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Tiyaro | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Vizion | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Whippy | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - |
Generated 2026-10-23 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.