AI Agents
AI AgentsAIAgentsAi AgentsAiAgentsai-agents
Providers using this tag (724)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 22 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 74 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 138 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 129 Limited public surface area
Emerging 210 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 151 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (175)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 36 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 51 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 39 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (60)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Agents” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 60 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 713 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Agents, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.6 | 23.4 | +11.2 | 713 |
| Access Clarity | 36.2 | 26.5 | +9.7 | 713 |
| Operational Transparency | 19 | 13.9 | +5.1 | 713 |
| Discoverability | 64.7 | 61.2 | +3.5 | 713 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.4 | +2.2 | 713 |
| Contract Quality | 21.6 | 19.8 | +1.8 | 713 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 10% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 43% | 13% | +30 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tray.ai 87.1
- 2 ZoomInfo 84.7
- 3 Close 78.8
- 4 LaunchDarkly 77.9
- 5 Regal 77.1
- 6 Drippay 76.1
- 7 Arcade 75.7
- 8 Remote 72.6
- 9 Postman 72.5
- 10 Relevance AI 72.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.