Analytics
ANALYTICSAnalyticsanalytics
Providers using this tag (1356)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 55 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 148 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 344 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 313 Limited public surface area
Emerging 260 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 236 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (869)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 124 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 147 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 277 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 209 Limited public surface area
Emerging 98 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1356 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Analytics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.6 | 17.9 | +15.7 | 1356 |
| Contract Quality | 31.8 | 17.5 | +14.3 | 1356 |
| Access Clarity | 35.9 | 22.3 | +13.6 | 1356 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.8 | 11.3 | +11.5 | 1356 |
| Discoverability | 68.4 | 60.4 | +8 | 1356 |
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.4 | +5.9 | 1356 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 7% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 9% | +13 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 13% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Amazon Pinpoint 83.1
- 3 HubSpot 82.4
- 4 Adobe 80.4
- 5 RudderStack 80.2
- 6 Swetrix 78.6
- 7 Treasure Data 76.7
- 8 Canvas LMS 76.2
- 9 MoEngage 75.8
- 10 Ada 75.7
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 Adobe Analytics 66.5
- 3 EODHD 66.3
- 4 Unify 65.8
- 5 Instantly 62.7
- 6 Automattic 62.3
- 7 Adobe Suite 61.5
- 8 Sarj AI Developer API 60.4
- 9 MoEngage 59.4
- 10 Profound 59.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/analytics"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/analytics"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/analytics/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.