Analytics
Providers using this tag (1009)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 52 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 94 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 189 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 206 Limited public surface area
Emerging 206 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 241 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (725)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 85 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 118 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 257 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 169 Limited public surface area
Emerging 85 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (408)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Analytics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 408 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
1009 providers carry this tag directly, and 1180 counting the 6 narrower tags below and the 1 beneath them — 171 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 904 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Analytics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 39 | 26.5 | +12.5 | 904 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.3 | 23.2 | +12.1 | 904 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.5 | 13.7 | +8.8 | 904 |
| Contract Quality | 24.8 | 17.6 | +7.2 | 904 |
| Discoverability | 62.7 | 58.1 | +4.6 | 904 |
| Contract Governance | 10.1 | 6.3 | +3.8 | 904 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 14% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 12% | +14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HubSpot 91.6
- 2 Salesforce 91
- 3 Dynatrace 86.3
- 4 Algolia 82.8
- 5 Snowflake 82.7
- 6 Adobe 80.4
- 7 Datadog 79.1
- 8 Amazon Pinpoint 78.9
- 9 RudderStack 78.5
- 10 Adobe Suite 78.3
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 MoEngage 67.8
- 3 Algolia 66.5
- 4 Listings API 66.1
- 5 Adobe 65
- 6 Adobe Analytics 64
- 7 TextQL 63.6
- 8 Adobe Suite 62.3
- 9 Bitly 60.6
- 10 Synup 60.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.