Analytics
ANALYTICSAnalyticsanalytics
Providers using this tag (982)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 38 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 85 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 219 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 194 Limited public surface area
Emerging 213 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 183 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 50 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (751)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 60 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 134 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 282 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 190 Limited public surface area
Emerging 80 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (421)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Analytics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 421 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 873 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Analytics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.1 | 23.4 | +12.7 | 873 |
| Access Clarity | 39.1 | 26.5 | +12.6 | 873 |
| Operational Transparency | 23 | 13.9 | +9.1 | 873 |
| Contract Quality | 27.4 | 19.8 | +7.6 | 873 |
| Discoverability | 65.8 | 61.2 | +4.6 | 873 |
| Contract Governance | 10.1 | 6.4 | +3.7 | 873 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 10% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 13% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 95% | 96% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 14% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 87.5
- 2 HubSpot 87.1
- 3 Dynatrace 86.5
- 4 Amazon Pinpoint 82.2
- 5 Snowflake 81.2
- 6 Adobe 78.5
- 7 Clarivate 78.1
- 8 Elastic Stack (ELK Stack) 76.7
- 9 RudderStack 76.2
- 10 Swetrix 75.9
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 MoEngage 67.8
- 3 Adobe Analytics 64
- 4 TextQL 63.6
- 5 Adobe Suite 62.3
- 6 Algolia 61.5
- 7 Automattic 60.2
- 8 Unify 60
- 9 Triple Whale 59.2
- 10 Immutable 58.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.