Data
Datadata
Providers using this tag (304)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 65 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 62 Limited public surface area
Emerging 76 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 73 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 6 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (237)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 39 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 37 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 71 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 53 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (159)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 159 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 281 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.1 | 23.4 | +10.7 | 281 |
| Access Clarity | 33 | 26.5 | +6.5 | 281 |
| Discoverability | 65.5 | 61.2 | +4.3 | 281 |
| Operational Transparency | 18 | 14 | +4 | 281 |
| Contract Quality | 22.8 | 19.8 | +3 | 281 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.4 | +2.3 | 281 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 13% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 14% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ZoomInfo 84.7
- 2 Snowflake 81.2
- 3 Clarivate 78.1
- 4 CData 74.6
- 5 Google Analytics 69
- 6 Airbyte 67.4
- 7 Dremio | Intelligent Lakehouse Platform 67.4
- 8 TextQL 66.6
- 9 Lucid 65.6
- 10 Semrush 63.5
- 1 CData 64
- 2 TextQL 63.6
- 3 Monid 56.5
- 4 Equals 56.1
- 5 Sylvia API 55.6
- 6 AnyAPI 55.4
- 7 ZoomInfo 54.7
- 8 Celonis 51.8
- 9 Dremio | Intelligent Lakehouse Platform 49.9
- 10 Lucid 48.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.