Data
Providers using this tag (1113)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 28 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 80 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 204 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 207 Limited public surface area
Emerging 275 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 314 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (279)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 27 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 44 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 79 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 78 Limited public surface area
Emerging 42 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (225)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 225 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 853 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 38.9 | 30 | +8.9 | 853 |
| Contract Quality | 26.1 | 18.6 | +7.5 | 853 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.5 | 24.5 | +7 | 853 |
| Contract Governance | 13.7 | 9.7 | +4 | 853 |
| Discoverability | 61.8 | 59.1 | +2.7 | 853 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.2 | 13.2 | +2 | 853 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 18% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 16% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 52% | 36% | +16 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 JobsPipe 100
- 2 ZoomInfo 86.8
- 3 CData 84
- 4 Snowflake 82.3
- 5 Google Analytics 79.7
- 6 Lucid 77.9
- 7 Airbyte 77.5
- 8 Google Cloud Storage 74.1
- 9 Argorant 72.5
- 10 AWS Glue 71.7
- 1 JobsPipe 82.7
- 2 AnyAPI 73.5
- 3 Compabase 72.9
- 4 Space Frontiers 68.9
- 5 FindLocal 68.2
- 6 CData 67.3
- 7 Collate 65.9
- 8 findadoctor-si 65.5
- 9 Argorant 65
- 10 ZoomInfo 64.3
Coverage caveat. 603 of 853 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.