Finance
Financefinance
Providers using this tag (237)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 47 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 56 Limited public surface area
Emerging 53 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 64 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (136)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 25 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (48)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Finance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 225 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Finance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 27.2 | 19.8 | +7.4 | 225 |
| Access Clarity | 30.7 | 26.5 | +4.2 | 225 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.4 | +3 | 225 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 61.2 | +2.4 | 225 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.8 | 23.4 | +2.4 | 225 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.9 | 14 | +1.9 | 225 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 13% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Polygon 68.3
- 2 Cledara 65.2
- 3 Tink 65.2
- 4 Cracked API 64
- 5 Barclays 62
- 6 StockData 60.6
- 7 We > Ultrarich 59.9
- 8 Genome 57.5
- 9 FlowAccount 57.2
- 10 ReefAPI 56.9
- 1 Polygon 63.1
- 2 Cracked API 62
- 3 Datarails 59.2
- 4 BTC War Live Market Data API 55
- 5 Campfire 54.1
- 6 Cledara 52.5
- 7 Xero 51.8
- 8 Rillet 50.8
- 9 Intrinio 46.8
- 10 Barclays 46.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.