Financial Services
Providers using this tag (1156)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 37 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 140 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 164 Limited public surface area
Emerging 334 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 466 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (57)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Financial Services” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
1156 providers carry this tag directly, and 2263 counting the 9 narrower tags below and the 33 beneath them — 1107 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1087 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Financial Services, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0 | 1087 |
| Discoverability | 57.9 | 58.1 | -0.2 | 1087 |
| Access Clarity | 25.4 | 26.5 | -1.1 | 1087 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.4 | 23.2 | -1.8 | 1087 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.5 | 13.7 | -3.2 | 1087 |
| Contract Quality | 13.6 | 17.6 | -4 | 1087 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 14% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 12% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stripe 81.6
- 2 Upstox 74.9
- 3 Stax 72.4
- 4 Token.io 70
- 5 Canopy Connect 67.5
- 6 Gemini Trust Company 67.5
- 7 Blnk Finance 67.4
- 8 Spade 66.7
- 9 Lightspark 66.4
- 10 Adyen 66.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.