Financial-Services
Financial ServicesFinancial-Services
Providers using this tag (1160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 48 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 157 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 142 Limited public surface area
Emerging 334 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 447 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 24 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (226)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 148 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 29 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Financial-Services” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 1085 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Financial-Services, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.4 | -0.1 | 1085 |
| Discoverability | 60.6 | 61.2 | -0.6 | 1085 |
| Access Clarity | 25 | 26.5 | -1.5 | 1085 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.4 | 23.4 | -2 | 1085 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.4 | 14 | -3.6 | 1085 |
| Contract Quality | 14.7 | 19.8 | -5.1 | 1085 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Stripe 79.7
- 2 Upstox 79.5
- 3 Stax 75.3
- 4 Blnk Finance 71.8
- 5 Canopy Connect 71
- 6 Lightspark 70.3
- 7 Spade 70.1
- 8 Citizens Financial Group 67.1
- 9 Method Financial 65.9
- 10 Adyen 65.4
- 1 Mollie 69.8
- 2 Clear Street 63.2
- 3 Upstox 60.7
- 4 Lukka 57.2
- 5 ChargeAfter 56.9
- 6 nCino 56.7
- 7 Moneris 52.6
- 8 Blnk Finance 52.2
- 9 Ripple Labs 51.8
- 10 Xero 51.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.