Investment Management
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Asset and Wealth Management | 29% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Investment Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 23.5 | 23.9 | -0.4 | 63 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 6.5 | -0.5 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 57.2 | 57.9 | -0.7 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.2 | 13 | -4.8 | 63 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 15.7 | 23.2 | -7.5 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 7.2 | 17.2 | -10 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 16% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Yardi Canada 55.7
- 2 SS&C Technologies 45.5
- 3 Moment 45.2
- 4 Addepar 37
- 5 Blackstone 35.8
- 6 BlackRock 35.7
- 7 Yardi 35.3
- 8 Agora Real Estate 35.2
- 9 Aladdin Studio 32.9
- 10 TIAA 32.5
- 1 Yardi Canada 48
- 2 Moment 36.6
- 3 SS&C Technologies 30.4
- 4 Aladdin Studio 29.5
- 5 BlackRock 26.5
- 6 Yardi 25.5
- 7 Apollo Global Management 24.7
- 8 TIAA 24.6
- 9 Franklin Resources 23.6
- 10 Juniper Square 22.2
Coverage caveat. 59 of 63 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.