Investment Management
Providers using this tag (77)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 33 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Asset and Wealth Management | 29% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 66 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Investment Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29 | 30 | -1 | 66 |
| Discoverability | 57.8 | 59.1 | -1.3 | 66 |
| Contract Governance | 7.3 | 9.7 | -2.4 | 66 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.5 | 13.2 | -3.7 | 66 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.7 | 24.5 | -7.8 | 66 |
| Contract Quality | 8.1 | 18.6 | -10.5 | 66 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 18% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 16% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 36% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 MRI Software 62.6
- 2 Yardi Canada 53.1
- 3 SS&C Technologies 48.2
- 4 Moment 47.7
- 5 BlackRock 44.8
- 6 Addepar 39
- 7 Yardi 36.6
- 8 Blackstone 35.8
- 9 Agora Real Estate 34.6
- 10 CBRE 34.3
- 1 Yardi Canada 48
- 2 Moment 36.6
- 3 SS&C Technologies 30.4
- 4 Aladdin Studio 29.5
- 5 Yardi 25.5
- 6 MRI Software 24.7
- 7 Apollo Global Management 24.7
- 8 TIAA 24.6
- 9 BlackRock 23.7
- 10 Franklin Resources 23.6
Coverage caveat. 61 of 66 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.