Asset Management
Asset Managementasset-management
Providers using this tag (155)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 51 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 51 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (44)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 155 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Asset Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 20.1 | 17.5 | +2.6 | 155 |
| Access Clarity | 24.6 | 22.3 | +2.3 | 155 |
| Contract Governance | 7.5 | 6.4 | +1.1 | 155 |
| Discoverability | 61.3 | 60.4 | +0.9 | 155 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.7 | 17.9 | +0.8 | 155 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.1 | 11.3 | -1.2 | 155 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 16% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 13% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Showpad 66.2
- 2 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 3 Autodesk 60.2
- 4 MaintainX 56.5
- 5 Factorial 52.8
- 6 73 Strings 52.6
- 7 LeaseAccelerator 52.3
- 8 MuleSoft 51.9
- 9 Kaseya 51.6
- 10 Elemental Machines 51.1
- 1 OpenGov 63.1
- 2 Facilio 50.2
- 3 Decisiv 49
- 4 Showpad 48.2
- 5 Autodesk 43.2
- 6 VTS 37.2
- 7 Amazon IoT SiteWise 34.5
- 8 Factorial 34.2
- 9 MaintainX 32.9
- 10 Northern Trust 32.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/asset-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/asset-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/asset-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.