niche · 1.1 market domain

ETFs

Score 19.8 / 100 39 providers +13 via APIs 23 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: ETFETFs

Providers using this tag (39)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (23)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (13)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “ETFs” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

api-ninjas-com Barchart Bitrue Blockworks Bloomberg Index Solutions Limited (BISL) Dados B3 Equibles OwlChart quantsonar-com TIAA-CREF tickerbot-io TickerLayer Twelve Data

Score breakdown

Frequency
48.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
32.4
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
7.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Stocks 22 co-occurrences Mutual Funds 8 co-occurrences Fixed Income 7 co-occurrences Investing 14 co-occurrences Fundamentals 5 co-occurrences Asset Management 14 co-occurrences Options 8 co-occurrences Market Data 21 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag22
Provider tag39
Openapi tag12
Openapi op tag37

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged ETFs, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
38
of 39 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
27.4
+4.6 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
17.6
+4.3 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
2.6–64.6
median 28.5 · σ 17.5
How the 38 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 4Developing 6Thin 10Emerging 10Minimal 8
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Access Clarity 34.6 25 +9.6 38
Developer Ergonomics 26.9 22.1 +4.8 38
Contract Quality 22.2 18.2 +4 38
Discoverability 61.7 57.9 +3.8 38
Operational Transparency 14.7 12.4 +2.3 38
Contract Governance 11.2 9.4 +1.8 38

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 26% 16% +10
MCP server (first-party) 24% 14% +10
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 11% 13% -2
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 42% 35% +7

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Dinari 64.6
  2. 2 EODHD 62.2
  3. 3 Marketstack 56.6
  4. 4 Intrinio 54.4
  5. 5 Bitpanda 47.5
  6. 6 Finage 47.5
  7. 7 CryptoETF 46.6
  8. 8 Musaffa 44.8
  9. 9 FinancialData.Net 43.6
  10. 10 MerQube 39.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 EODHD 58.3
  2. 2 Intrinio 46.8
  3. 3 TickerInside 42.4
  4. 4 eToro 39
  5. 5 ValueRay 36.8
  6. 6 Firstrade 35.9
  7. 7 Coinrule 35.9
  8. 8 DriveWealth 35.3
  9. 9 Finage 34.2
  10. 10 WisdomTree 32.3
All 39 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 38 carry a score (97%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 27 of 38 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/etfs"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.