Stocks
StockEquitiesStocks
Providers using this tag (89)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 30 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (91)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (44)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Stocks” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Capital Markets and Trading | 48% |
| Private Markets and Fund Administration (ILPA, broker-dealer registration, options market-data vendors) | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 86 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Stocks, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.4 | 23.2 | +20.2 | 86 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 23.9 | +12.5 | 86 |
| Operational Transparency | 25 | 13 | +12 | 86 |
| Contract Quality | 28.3 | 17.2 | +11.1 | 86 |
| Discoverability | 66.2 | 57.9 | +8.3 | 86 |
| Contract Governance | 9.7 | 6.5 | +3.2 | 86 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 13% | +18 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 12% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 16% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 64.9
- 2 Financial Modeling Prep 61.7
- 3 SiftingIO 61.1
- 4 Twelve Data 60.7
- 5 ThetaData 59.9
- 6 Adanos Market Sentiment API 59.8
- 7 EODHD 55.9
- 8 Alpaca 53.9
- 9 Intrinio 52.8
- 10 Market Data 52.7
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 59.9
- 2 Twelve Data 58.9
- 3 EODHD 58.3
- 4 LinqAlpha 55.5
- 5 Alpaca 54.9
- 6 Morningstar 53.7
- 7 drillr 52.1
- 8 Alpha Vantage 51.4
- 9 Intrinio 46.8
- 10 Equibles 45.9
Coverage caveat. 65 of 86 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.