Stocks
StockEquitiesStocks
Providers using this tag (87)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (86)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (41)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Stocks” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 85 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Stocks, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.8 | 23.2 | +20.6 | 85 |
| Access Clarity | 42 | 26.5 | +15.5 | 85 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.5 | 13.7 | +13.8 | 85 |
| Contract Quality | 29.1 | 17.6 | +11.5 | 85 |
| Discoverability | 66.4 | 58.1 | +8.3 | 85 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.3 | +3.7 | 85 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 14% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 12% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 75.8
- 2 Twelve Data 69
- 3 Financial Modeling Prep 63.2
- 4 SiftingIO 61.1
- 5 Market Data 61
- 6 ThetaData 59.8
- 7 Adanos Market Sentiment API 59.7
- 8 EODHD 57.4
- 9 Alpaca 55.4
- 10 Barchart 54.7
- 1 Twelve Data 62
- 2 EODHD 57.6
- 3 Morningstar 56.8
- 4 LinqAlpha 54.5
- 5 Alpaca 54.2
- 6 Alpha Vantage 51.4
- 7 drillr 51.1
- 8 Intrinio 46.8
- 9 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 44.9
- 10 SIX 44
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.