Investing
Providers using this tag (167)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 68 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Investing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
167 providers carry this tag directly, and 171 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 4 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 159 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Investing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 27.5 | 26.5 | +1 | 159 |
| Contract Governance | 4.5 | 6.3 | -1.8 | 159 |
| Discoverability | 55 | 58.1 | -3.1 | 159 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.4 | 13.7 | -4.3 | 159 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17.5 | 23.2 | -5.7 | 159 |
| Contract Quality | 10.3 | 17.6 | -7.3 | 159 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 14% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Upstox 74.9
- 2 GitDealFlow 68.1
- 3 Clear Street 60.5
- 4 Alpaca 55.4
- 5 Groww 53.5
- 6 Tradier 52.4
- 7 Wefunder 50.7
- 8 Fund That Flip 50.4
- 9 AngelList 48.2
- 10 Ally Invest 47
- 1 Upstox 63.2
- 2 Clear Street 63.2
- 3 Morningstar 56.8
- 4 Wefunder 55.9
- 5 Alpaca 54.2
- 6 Tradier 43.2
- 7 GitDealFlow 42.7
- 8 AltoIRA 42.6
- 9 lemon.markets 41.5
- 10 Groww 41.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.