Private Markets
Providers using this tag (55)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 53 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Private Markets, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 33.1 | 26.5 | +6.6 | 53 |
| Discoverability | 59.8 | 58.1 | +1.7 | 53 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 6.3 | -0.3 | 53 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.3 | 23.2 | -2.9 | 53 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.6 | 13.7 | -4.1 | 53 |
| Contract Quality | 10.1 | 17.6 | -7.5 | 53 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 14% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 12% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 14% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Fundz 60.2
- 2 73 Strings 53
- 3 Crunchbase 49.9
- 4 Zest Equity 47.3
- 5 AltoIRA 46.6
- 6 Arch 43.9
- 7 Zest 43.3
- 8 Canoe Intelligence 41.1
- 9 Tracxn 39.9
- 10 Caplight 38.4
- 1 Caplight 62.3
- 2 Crunchbase 44.8
- 3 AltoIRA 42.6
- 4 Fundz 39.4
- 5 Zest Equity 36.4
- 6 Zest 36.4
- 7 Tracxn 33.6
- 8 73 Strings 31.5
- 9 CAIS 30.2
- 10 Notice 29.9
Coverage caveat. 49 of 53 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.