Venture Capital
Providers using this tag (121)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 90 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Venture Capital” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
121 providers carry this tag directly, and 122 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 105 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Venture Capital, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.5 | 6.3 | -3.8 | 105 |
| Discoverability | 53.1 | 58.1 | -5 | 105 |
| Operational Transparency | 5 | 13.7 | -8.7 | 105 |
| Access Clarity | 17.5 | 26.5 | -9 | 105 |
| Contract Quality | 4.6 | 17.6 | -13 | 105 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 10 | 23.2 | -13.2 | 105 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 GitDealFlow 68.1
- 2 Standard Metrics 58.9
- 3 CB Insights 55.2
- 4 Harmonic.ai 55
- 5 73 Strings 53
- 6 AngelList 48.2
- 7 Affinity 46.8
- 8 Unicorn Screener 40
- 9 Tracxn 39.9
- 10 Fundrise 38.5
- 1 Caplight 62.3
- 2 Harmonic.ai 58.1
- 3 CB Insights 52
- 4 Standard Metrics 50.9
- 5 GitDealFlow 42.7
- 6 Fundrise 36.4
- 7 Affinity 36
- 8 Tracxn 33.6
- 9 73 Strings 31.5
- 10 AngelList 26.8
Coverage caveat. 102 of 105 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.