Startups
Variants seen in the corpus:
StartupStartups
Providers using this tag (188)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
BetaListSeedLegalsBetaPageGeneral LegalPulleyTechCrunchFirstbaseThe Next WebForecastrAcquire.com (fka MicroAcquire)ClerkyPilotFeedoughSlidebeanEveryScoutzieUnifiedCRMCactosaa16CorgiGeekWireEquityBeeStartup BufferStartup RankingAptitude Medical SystemsLaunchRockHELPPrescienceCosmiccloudF6SIndie HackersCantarellenergyProject EuropeEmbroker
Minimal 138 Almost no public developer surface
FundersClubFundableLaunching NextAlliance DAOHustle FundPINRepublicVector LegalLatitudKraftfulPalus FinanceMarket VibeVonBoxBucketplace2da2ClarityMAGNiTTSK VenturesBite SquadFinmarkBlossomenergyCollovChanjeenergyChargelabFlorinArvo TechBetaworksBreathinvestmentBuykChobanifoodincubatorCircularboardCleanhomeCreativegalileoNoodle LabsSoftware Applications IncorporatedCrew32Leaders In TechAlwansBoomerangmedicalPartyphileCapital.xyzBoltstartupdevelopmentCryptofundagTiamatAlien LabsFreejitLaunchGramCollision (now Web Summit Vancouver)ArcEntrepreneur FirstAI FundChakrinnovationHigh AlphaTruman'sResolute VenturesFractalStem AIElMetrAvantGuardBossanovaroboticsincFactory WorksA CapitalCulinary SciencesCloudeatsArcticherocoreCharacter BiosciencesCrescitaliaCringleNXTPBasis Set VenturesForeword FundFounder CollectiveFreestyleGolden VenturesMaple VCMatchstick VenturesUnshackled Ventures IZunum Aero01 AdvisorsBennyBlue CurrentcrowdcubeCsdnanoKhazenlyLudlow VenturesChesapeake Green FuelsArrowyuantechnologyAvalonholographicsAvivaukAwantunaiBangsuntechnologyBcfbirdcagefoodsBeama123BeatBeepKartBeijinghongyutechnologyBirdleapBlokableincBlueageBlusmartmobilityBolsterc0d7Boombox42b0BosequantumBravecompanyCaguuuCentsba2fChituotechnologyChongxinchongwuChunfenghuayuCitizend7ceClever CarnivoreCorgi80d7Curated6efaWebvanCopilot4a49StudentFinanceBiomilqBitwise IndustriesCohere82b8CommonGroundSoneraAnimoldiscoveryBagelcodeBasebittechnologiesBetatechnologies1ecdBitwave163dBobsledincBoredprogrammersButter6f77Califiafarms2Campfirecd2dCanonicalltdCiderb40fClover36c1Codi2000MyGolaCred6ab0FounderDatingGTR
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
BetaList APIRead-only REST API over the BetaList startup directory. Three documented collections — startups (list + det...Web Summit Startup ProgrammeThe Web Summit Startup Programme (ALPHA and BETA tracks) provides early-stage companies with exhibition spa...F6S APIThe F6S API provides programmatic access to the F6S platform, the world's largest startup and founder commu...Indie Hackers APIThe Indie Hackers API provides programmatic access to the Indie Hackers community platform, enabling develo...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Startups” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
62.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.4
spread across providers
Quality lift
10.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Venture Capital 34 co-occurrences
Technology 46 co-occurrences
Investor 13 co-occurrences
Investment 21 co-occurrences
Fundraising 10 co-occurrences
Early Stage 8 co-occurrences
Finance 29 co-occurrences
Pre-Seed 7 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag188
Api tag8
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag5
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 116 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Startups, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
116
of 197 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
6.4
-5.6 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 116 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 0Developing 11Thin 5Emerging 33Minimal 65
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 23.6 | 23.9 | -0.3 | 116 |
| Contract Governance | 3.1 | 6.5 | -3.4 | 116 |
| Discoverability | 53.2 | 57.9 | -4.7 | 116 |
| Operational Transparency | 6 | 13 | -7 | 116 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12 | 23.2 | -11.2 | 116 |
| Contract Quality | 5 | 17.2 | -12.2 | 116 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 16% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Match It Up
- 2 GitDealFlow
- 3 Wefunder
- 4 Carta
- 5 Revnu
- 6 Crunchbase
- 7 AngelList
- 8 Result
- 9 Unicorn Screener
- 10 PitchBook
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Wefunder {"score" => 56.6, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 2 Carta {"score" => 49.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Crunchbase {"score" => 46, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 GitDealFlow {"score" => 45.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 ToolRouter {"score" => 43.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Match It Up {"score" => 42.1, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 Revnu {"score" => 37.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 8 Tracxn {"score" => 33.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 Result {"score" => 32.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 Wellfound {"score" => 32.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
All 197 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 116 carry a score (59%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 109 of 116 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 109 of 116 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.