Technology
Providers using this tag (95)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 31 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 43 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Technology” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 91 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Technology, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 59.1 | 61 | -1.9 | 91 |
| Contract Governance | 4.3 | 6.5 | -2.2 | 91 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.8 | 14 | -4.2 | 91 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.6 | 23.4 | -6.8 | 91 |
| Contract Quality | 12.5 | 20.1 | -7.6 | 91 |
| Access Clarity | 16 | 26.5 | -10.5 | 91 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 10% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 13% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Pluralsight 73.9
- 2 Apple 55.1
- 3 NewTqnia | Technology News, AI and Innovation 53.7
- 4 Patsnap 48.9
- 5 IEEE Xplore 44.4
- 6 Lalamove 42.9
- 7 Booz Allen Hamilton 42.6
- 8 KPMG 42.1
- 9 Delivery Hero 37.6
- 10 Webull 37.2
- 1 Pluralsight 50.9
- 2 NewTqnia | Technology News, AI and Innovation 44.4
- 3 IEEE Xplore 35.4
- 4 Kurly 34.3
- 5 Delivery Hero 33.2
- 6 Cubic Corporation 31
- 7 Webull 29.5
- 8 Apple 28.3
- 9 EcoFlow 27.2
- 10 Patsnap 26.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.