Technology
Providers using this tag (96)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 46 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 96 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Technology, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 58.7 | 60.4 | -1.7 | 96 |
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.4 | -2.9 | 96 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.3 | 11.3 | -4 | 96 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.5 | 17.9 | -5.4 | 96 |
| Contract Quality | 11.2 | 17.5 | -6.3 | 96 |
| Access Clarity | 14.1 | 22.3 | -8.2 | 96 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 16% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 7% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 9% | -8 |
| Security | 96% | 88% | +8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 13% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Apple 52.8
- 2 Patsnap 49.2
- 3 Pluralsight 48.5
- 4 IEEE Xplore 43.6
- 5 Lalamove 42.4
- 6 KPMG 37.7
- 7 Webull 37.5
- 8 Artemis 36.6
- 9 The National Aeronautics and Space Administration 36.5
- 10 Kurly 36.2
- 1 IEEE Xplore 35.4
- 2 Kurly 34.3
- 3 Webull 29.5
- 4 Apple 28.3
- 5 EcoFlow 27.2
- 6 Patsnap 26.7
- 7 Delivery Hero 25.3
- 8 Lalamove 23.6
- 9 Futu 23.2
- 10 Artemis 22.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.