Services
ServiceServices
Providers using this tag (170)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 38 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 103 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (305)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 35 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 54 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 92 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 94 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (291)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Services” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 291 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 110 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Services, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 56.2 | 59.1 | -2.9 | 110 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 9.7 | -3.7 | 110 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.9 | 13.2 | -6.3 | 110 |
| Access Clarity | 22.4 | 30 | -7.6 | 110 |
| Contract Quality | 9.8 | 18.6 | -8.8 | 110 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 15.4 | 24.5 | -9.1 | 110 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 18% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 16% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 1% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 36% | -10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Azure AI Search 58.1
- 2 Azure AI Speech 57.9
- 3 SendBridge 50.1
- 4 fabricatedemail-com 50
- 5 ServiceChannel 50
- 6 Nuvidian AI, LLC 49.7
- 7 securessmtp-com 46.5
- 8 ARC-Relay 45.6
- 9 Zenoti 45.5
- 10 Geocode.Farm 45.3
- 1 InfraPulse 58.6
- 2 Nuvidian AI, LLC 43.9
- 3 securessmtp-com 39.1
- 4 fabricatedemail-com 38.5
- 5 Fold Laundry 38.2
- 6 The Retreat 37.6
- 7 SendBridge 36.6
- 8 nsgoods-org 36.6
- 9 SurePoint Pro 36.3
- 10 ServiceChannel 35.9
Coverage caveat. 98 of 110 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.