Consulting
Providers using this tag (216)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Technology Advisors51offerPaper InstrumentsPrimeurAgent ExperiencesTetra TechCritical Path PartnersAltair AIBespinglobalFTI ConsultingBoardroom BobHarbor GlobalCatalantKantarSlalomDataArtPlusMargingtmhelix-comInnertrendsEmatic Solutionsheera-itp0stmanDeloitteVeratech for HealthTredencerohnelt-devFlowscopeBridgetown ResearchPlanYearMerkabaPhi ASjaikin-euAppGenieOnFrontierselliat-nlAlvarez & MarsalGerson Lehrman Group (GLG)
Minimal 159 Almost no public developer surface
AlixPartnersAccentureCelebal TechnologiesCGIVoyaCollabora Ltd.Streamline DigitalAivarVirtusaIT system integrationHuron Consulting GroupCalificadasimpactengines-aiKurrawongAICareer BhavanRotten Grapes Private LimitedSpheraGeocento LimitedBain & CompanyApar InfotechCulturePinionBeniButkeraites Intelligent SolutionsAxiom GlobalEYAcuver consultingEOX IT Services GmbHArsagapartnersChaparral SoftwarePromptech AIAeon AI Risk ManagementAxon AgenticSelectstarDglgroupllcGatewayGeoAI ChurchInfosysNuvelarVision33RCS (Resource Consulting Services)Purpose GreenDavid Evans and AssociatesiTalent Digitaldudko-devKorn FerryAshley PayneCH2M HillCamptocamp SAChannelcorpAppirioHill InternationalVisasQCirclesecoExpertenCssmartNTT DATABosonicCogniLedger Solutions S.R.L.Desafío ComunicaciónGlobal Nomad GIS Services, LLCNubityÁngel MoncadaBGL GroupBitscoinsconsultingEverRESTUpland Consulting GroupUUSEC TechnologyAmcandpCatalystdevworksNoodle LabsCollegeconsortiumOld Town MediaCandextechnologiesValiant NetworksMint State LabsInitusCustomer AnalyticsmPower SocialFractal AnalyticsArclera DigitalOgilvyCrowdplatBroentechcybercentry-co-ukMightyHiveCohnReznickigods-comAgile Growth LabsPovioChromaWayCodecCore10برندوانTorry Harris Business SolutionsAvenue3SynapticPortfolioAI OrchestrationWorleystartvest-ailat/lon GmbHRubric LabsfreshEHRKiwop LLMOpsSpatialedgeA.TeamCfgiAugasterStealth WorkerWoolpert, Inc.C² SystemsAiculusBlackcubeCultureheroPwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers)LexooGECOsistema srlJumpSpatineo OyAtomica InformaticsAlok BarnwalEpsilon Italia srlloopingagent-comPanaceaScaia LLMOpsBusinesscanvasImpactionMu SigmaCrimsonMogulENGIE Insight ServicesKrunchHang TenCarr, Riggs & Ingram (CRI)ClarityFoasterMorph SystemsPersistentPlanby TechnologiesAPP Group Ness CzechiaAyimaCognitive HorizonMarkrMcGill TechnologiesMarsh & McLennanQLCRightpointrjctdlabs-xyzTapchiefTorry Harris Business SolutionsAi-BlockchainDeploycoIncognito TechnologiesSkillbridgeTallanBrillSlickrock.devComputer Sciences Corporation
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
60.4
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
12.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Professional Services 26 co-occurrences
Digital Transformation 20 co-occurrences
Advisory 13 co-occurrences
Software Development 13 co-occurrences
IT Services 10 co-occurrences
Strategy 8 co-occurrences
Engineering 10 co-occurrences
Technology 17 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag216
Api tag1
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Professional Services (consulting, systems integrators, agencies) | 71% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 164 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Consulting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
164
of 216 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
10.9
-11.9 vs catalog 22.8
Mean Agent Readiness
4.7
-8.6 vs catalog 13.3
Spread
2.6–47.2
median 7.2 · σ 9.7
How the 164 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 6Thin 11Emerging 29Minimal 118
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 54.1 | 57.9 | -3.8 | 164 |
| Contract Governance | 3.6 | 9.4 | -5.8 | 164 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.7 | 12.4 | -7.7 | 164 |
| Access Clarity | 11.4 | 25 | -13.6 | 164 |
| Contract Quality | 4.4 | 18.2 | -13.8 | 164 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 7.9 | 22.1 | -14.2 | 164 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 16% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 14% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 35% | -22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Cognizant Technology Solutions 47.2
- 2 Globant 46
- 3 Polycode 41.8
- 4 2X 41.2
- 5 Concentrix 40.2
- 6 ayushrai-site 40.1
- 7 Booz Allen Hamilton 40
- 8 Brasil GEO 36.2
- 9 CRM Agency 33.5
- 10 Outworx 33.5
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Brasil GEO 55.1
- 2 ayushrai-site 53.8
- 3 2X 50.5
- 4 zerowidth-ai 40.3
- 5 Globant 35.7
- 6 heera-it 34
- 7 4chems 30.8
- 8 Concentrix 29.1
- 9 Polycode 28.7
- 10 KPMG 27.7
All 216 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 164 carry a score (76%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 158 of 164 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 158 of 164 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 7 November 2026, across 38912 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.