Consulting
Providers using this tag (123)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 91 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Professional Services (consulting, systems integrators, agencies) | 71% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 95 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Consulting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.3 | 6.3 | -4 | 95 |
| Discoverability | 53.7 | 58.1 | -4.4 | 95 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.4 | 13.7 | -7.3 | 95 |
| Access Clarity | 15.2 | 26.5 | -11.3 | 95 |
| Contract Quality | 4.3 | 17.6 | -13.3 | 95 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 9.1 | 23.2 | -14.1 | 95 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 11% | -10 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Polycode 47.3
- 2 Globant 44.7
- 3 Cognizant Technology Solutions 39.6
- 4 KPMG 39.6
- 5 Booz Allen Hamilton 38.4
- 6 Concentrix 37.9
- 7 2X 34.5
- 8 McKinsey & Company 33
- 9 Publicis Groupe 29.4
- 10 Towers Watson 29.1
- 1 2X 49.5
- 2 Globant 35.7
- 3 Concentrix 29.1
- 4 Polycode 27.2
- 5 Booz Allen Hamilton 25.2
- 6 Cognizant Technology Solutions 23.1
- 7 KPMG 22.9
- 8 51offer 21.3
- 9 Towers Watson 19.8
- 10 p0stman 13.7
Coverage caveat. 92 of 95 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.