Professional Services (consulting, systems integrators, agencies)
Register market (platform services-partner directories; firms ranked by certified designations). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- AWS Partner Solutions Finder (api.finder.partners.aws.a2z.com/search, size=20, split by location) machine-readable, 10,054 partners after location partitioning (one call caps at 10,000); services path only; 33 firms linked. The endpoint throttles with HTTP 310 under parallel load: read one location at a time, throttled locations are never cached
- Salesforce AppExchange consultants (api.appexchange.salesforce.com/recommendations/v3/listings?type=consultants) machine-readable, paging parameters are ignored: pageSize=5000 returns 1,185 of 4,876; plus 342 keyword queries for catalog services firms = 2,761 listings read; 21 linked. PARTIAL coverage
- HubSpot Solutions Directory (chirp PersonalizationPublicRpc/search + getListingDetailsV3) machine-readable, 3,493 partner profiles; 0 catalog services firms linked (agencies listed are not in the catalog)
- Snowflake partner directory (filterable_resources.filter.json +
.model.json) machine-readable, 1,502 of 1,533 partners; 1,411 services badge; 16 linked - Databricks partner directory (en-partners-assets/data/partner/all/en.json) machine-readable, 1,885 partners, 1,493 C&SI; participation only (no designation published); 14 linked
- Microsoft partner directory (marketplacepartnerdirectory.azure.com/api/partners) not machine-readable: not enumerable: pageOffset capped at 500 over ~349,000 location rows; freetext only. Not read (a name-driven query would skew coverage) (2026-10-19)
- Google Cloud Partner Advantage directory not machine-readable: client-rendered; no public JSON (2026-10-19)
- ServiceNow partner finder not machine-readable: behind login (2026-10-19)
- SAP PartnerEdge partner finder not machine-readable: client-rendered; API needs a session token (2026-10-19)
- Adobe Solution Partner directory not machine-readable: client-rendered (2026-10-19)
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-19 from the 41 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | Consulting 68%, Cloud 24%, Digital Transformation 24% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Consulting 68%, Digital Transformation 37%, Infrastructure 24%, MCP 22%, Security 22% |
| Industries | Professional Services 78%, Artificial Intelligence 37% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
standard 35 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allcloud | 67.0 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| NTT DATA | 60.5 | 11 | 0 / 11 | 0 | 4 | 0 | standard 69%, distribution 31% |
| Maximus | 59.9 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 33%, standard 67% |
| DXC Technology | 58.8 | 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 71%, builds-on-platform 14%, distribution 14% |
| Slalom | 58.6 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 80%, distribution 20% |
| Persistent | 56.5 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 75%, distribution 25% |
| Globant | 56.3 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 80%, distribution 20% |
| EY | 55.6 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 80%, builds-on-platform 20% |
| EPAM Systems | 53.7 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 50%, builds-on-platform 40%, distribution 10% |
| Huron Consulting Group | 52.9 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | contract 20%, standard 40%, builds-on-platform 20%, distribution 20% |
| Rackspace Technology | 52.9 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 60%, distribution 20%, atp-outside 20% |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions | 52.2 | 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 62%, builds-on-platform 12%, distribution 25% |
| Infosys | 52.1 | 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | standard 55%, builds-on-platform 9%, distribution 36% |
| PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) | 52.0 | 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 50%, builds-on-platform 25%, distribution 25% |
| Bespinglobal | 51.7 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| Tredence | 51.7 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 75%, distribution 25% |
| Kyndryl | 50.5 | 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 67%, distribution 33% |
| Virtusa | 47.9 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 60%, distribution 40% |
| Unisys | 46.4 | 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | standard 60%, distribution 40% |
| Fractal Analytics | 45.0 | 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | standard 40%, distribution 60% |
| Concentrix | 44.7 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| ExlService Holdings | 37.0 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Cleardata | 31.9 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| Mu Sigma | 26.8 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | standard 50%, distribution 50% |
| Nubity | 23.6 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Synaptic | 23.6 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Aivar | 22.3 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| McKinsey & Company | 22.3 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Apiphani | 18.5 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Alvarez & Marsal | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Arsagapartners | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Ematic Solutions | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| FTI Consulting | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Options Technology | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
| Rightpoint | 17.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | standard 100% |
distribution 4 · only sells through cloud marketplaces
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conduent | 9.6 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| Gartner | 9.6 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| Towers Watson | 9.6 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | distribution 100% |
| Publicis Groupe | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | distribution 100% |
undeclared 2 · declares nothing we can read: no number
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appirio | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - | |
| MightyHive | undeclared | - | - | - | - | - |
Generated 2026-10-19 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.