Engineering
Providers using this tag (78)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 37 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (4)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Engineering” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 72 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Engineering, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 4.5 | 6.3 | -1.8 | 72 |
| Discoverability | 56.2 | 58.1 | -1.9 | 72 |
| Access Clarity | 23.9 | 26.5 | -2.6 | 72 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.7 | 23.2 | -4.5 | 72 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.5 | 13.7 | -5.2 | 72 |
| Contract Quality | 11.5 | 17.6 | -6.1 | 72 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 MATLAB 72.4
- 2 Autodesk 59.9
- 3 Onshape 59.7
- 4 Autodesk Construction Cloud 50.6
- 5 AutoCAD 47.8
- 6 Oracle Primavera 44.9
- 7 Violetlabs 42.3
- 8 IEEE Xplore 41.4
- 9 Dassault Systèmes 41
- 10 Physna 39.7
- 1 Autodesk 44.6
- 2 ADRO 36.3
- 3 IEEE Xplore 35.4
- 4 APIs.io Engineering Platform 35.3
- 5 Onshape 35
- 6 Newforma 33.9
- 7 MATLAB 33.5
- 8 Physna 31.5
- 9 Dassault Systèmes 30.6
- 10 Autodesk Construction Cloud 27.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.