Engineering
Providers using this tag (163)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 53 Early or largely undocumented
Deployment AI Inc.École des Ponts ParisTechRevolutionTopEngineering Leader GuideBildAnsysAECOMRezonantMonographFlowcalc.engineerTetra TechDanfossStarion Groupzalize-comTech Soft 3DApiplatform.ioTactonQuaisrRatedPowerFluorOperonCenosIO ServicesMotifBechtelRe:BuildBlattnertechPenn State Applied Research LabKonecranes3DOptixFOXIFYCheapCADToolsShapr3DDevMatchProtolabsBalfordSkanskaCircuitLabDynamik OrbitsShapeCICertivityAvoiceAletiqCalculProAndelaDolphin Industrial PartsSPiNCareercraftCoreminsC-InfinityWaseem Anjum
Minimal 75 Almost no public developer surface
TEDIBeyond MathAomstechnologiesWorleyPhysicsxCelusCOMSOLSandvikSchool of Engineering & Applied Science, Ahmedabad UniversityWoolpert, Inc.NV5 Geospatial, Inc.SimrDavid Evans and AssociatesEngineering Leadership ConferenceAI ChurchPeter Kiewit Sons'Cymosoft JSCJawaharlal Nehru Technological University HyderabadMonadelphousCS GroupSadbhav EngineeringEagleTorusINESC TEC - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and ScienceCorepowerholdingspteltdAPI Evangelist ToolsCH2M HillHochschule für Technik StuttgartIndian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay)element14CoreelKrunchJacobs Engineering GroupBrickboltKBRMonolith AINPcoJacobs SolutionsUniversity of Applied Sciences, Western Switzerland, School of Business & Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD)AresmaterialsAstrogenCompass, Inc.Guffey HoldingsOnScaleSIMULIA (Dassault Systemes)ConagenKenexisUniversity of Florida, Florida Institute for Built Environment ResilienceLindeA.TeamBancadaPololuNRW HoldingsParsonsDrapeCutDowner GroupDaniel SuchanBenchmarkspacesystemsAxtonInstitute of Communication and Computer Systems (ICCS)Cowin4DBIMBureau National d'Etudes Techniques et de Developpement (BNETD)Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (DBATU)Hill InternationalProject PrometheusBureau National d'Etudes Techniques et de Developpement (BNETD)Jason LovellWillbros GroupCanvasconstructionFindingSteel灵数求解器HelicielResonado LabsBigpicture
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Fresnel Software Engineering APIThe Engineering API from Fresnel Software — 49 operation(s) for engineering.Seismic Design Web ServiceWeb services produced by the U.S. Geological Survey for calculating parameter values from various seismic d...IEEE Xplore Metadata Search APIREST endpoint for querying and retrieving metadata records and abstracts for more than 6 million documents ...
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
DTIC Research and Engineering (R&E) GatewayAuthenticated portal for DoD researchers and registered users to access DTIC research and engineering resou...Linde APIThe Linde API provides access to platform services and data for enterprise integration and automation.Parsons Corporation APIThe Parsons Corporation API provides access to platform services and data for enterprise integration and au...
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Engineering” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Defense Technical Information Center
Fresnel Software
Timken
U.S. Geological Survey
University of Canterbury
Score breakdown
Frequency
56.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
16.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
6.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
CAD 15 co-occurrences
Simulation 21 co-occurrences
Construction 27 co-occurrences
Architecture 9 co-occurrences
CAE 7 co-occurrences
PLM 7 co-occurrences
BIM 6 co-occurrences
Design Automation 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag163
Api tag8
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Engineering CAD, CAE and PLM | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 131 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Engineering, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
131
of 163 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
18.5
-5.6 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
9
-5.1 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
2.2–72.9
median 13.2 · σ 16.2
How the 131 split by band
Exemplar 3Strong 2Developing 12Thin 15Emerging 46Minimal 53
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 56.4 | 59.1 | -2.7 | 131 |
| Contract Governance | 6.6 | 9.7 | -3.1 | 131 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.5 | 13.2 | -3.7 | 131 |
| Access Clarity | 24.7 | 30 | -5.3 | 131 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.2 | 24.5 | -6.3 | 131 |
| Contract Quality | 11.1 | 18.6 | -7.5 | 131 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 18% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 16% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 98% | 99% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 36% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Autodesk 72.9
- 2 Autodesk Construction Cloud 69
- 3 MATLAB 68.8
- 4 ARCNM 63.7
- 5 Onshape 62.7
- 6 Cogram 50.3
- 7 Violetlabs 49
- 8 Ask Marcel 48.3
- 9 Delft University of Technology 47.8
- 10 Acrux Core 46.9
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 ADRO 49.6
- 2 Autodesk 46.9
- 3 ARCNM 46.6
- 4 Autodesk Construction Cloud 41.2
- 5 Ask Marcel 40.7
- 6 SLB 38.1
- 7 Onshape 35.1
- 8 Newforma 34.1
- 9 HVAC Builder 33.9
- 10 APIs.io Engineering Platform 33.6
All 163 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 131 carry a score (80%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 116 of 131 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 116 of 131 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.