Infrastructure
Infrastructureinfrastructure
Providers using this tag (394)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 88 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 74 Limited public surface area
Emerging 79 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 103 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (100)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (52)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Infrastructure” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 52 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 347 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Infrastructure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.3 | 23.4 | +13.9 | 347 |
| Contract Quality | 25.8 | 19.8 | +6 | 347 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.3 | 13.9 | +4.4 | 347 |
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 61.2 | +2.6 | 347 |
| Contract Governance | 8.1 | 6.4 | +1.7 | 347 |
| Access Clarity | 27.5 | 26.5 | +1 | 347 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 95% | 96% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon VPN 73.3
- 2 Knock 71.6
- 3 New Relic 68.1
- 4 Synadia Communications 65.9
- 5 NexGen Cloud 64.3
- 6 Daytona 63.4
- 7 Amazon EC2 62.8
- 8 Nasuni 61.7
- 9 Webscale Networks 61.4
- 10 Facets 60.5
- 1 Knock 58.6
- 2 The San Francisco Compute Company 53.4
- 3 Moneris 52.6
- 4 Platform.sh 49.5
- 5 NexGen Cloud 47.2
- 6 Sail 43.2
- 7 PingCAP 42.6
- 8 Google Cloud Platform 42.3
- 9 Oracle 41.9
- 10 First Resonance 41.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.