Data Center
Variants seen in the corpus:
Data-CenterData Centers
Providers using this tag (160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
AxiadoLenovoHPE Aruba NetworkingVEIRGigaIOFabric8LabsAria NetworksEriduInfinitumAchronix SemiconductorAccelsiusReed SemiconductorMetrobloksCato DigitalMainspring EnergyCogent CommunicationsPhononicNexthop AILast EnergyPhaidraAstera LabsScaleFluxOrbital MaterialsForesightUtilidataBluwaveaiNeurophosLightelligenceGradiantMayMaan Research
Minimal 103 Almost no public developer surface
CelLinkEmpower SemiconductorAi FabrikVoltServerCowboy Space Corporation (formerly Aetherflux)TenstorrentChelsio CommunicationsTensordyneUpscale AILumilensVSORACormintIceotopenlytezincfiveAntora EnergyExowattHeron PowerCondor EnergySeeqcXsight LabsClarosTeseracAuradine (Velaura AI)Path RoboticsDayOneDorado SoftwareFrore SystemsBlixtKosAheadComputingAugmentaAyr EnergySkeleton TechnologiesGenesis Digital AssetsNeocarbonOpenlightclounixCumulus NetworksVertical SemiconductorGyre EnergyPetra PowerXING MobilityGreen Revolution CoolingPicoJoolDoxelAgotoZ TechnologyLetelMajestic LabsRivosByanatSoma EnergySygaldryUnigridEnergyBankEtchedLiquidStackVoxel Energy21VianetEliyanAlsym EnergyAMP FundInviscid AIRcomRelated CompaniesAttotudeAwavesemiColony Capital (DigitalBridge Group)Iron MountainLightmatterSnowcap ComputeStarcloudPower LatticeAugtera NetworksPanthalassaAriBioLaser Light CommunicationsNerviomCrayPluribus NetworksAgrani LabsAkash SystemsviaPhotonMadroneAsetekHyperLightInnoviumNubisOmenPlatespinPlexxi *Celestial AIDigital Realty TrustBitfusionCalxedaCloudistics (Fungible)DatriumFungibleFusion I/OPliant TechnologySkyport Systems *StorabilityStratoScale
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Cisco Umbrella Data Center APIThe Data Center API from Cisco Umbrella — 1 operation(s) for data center.Cisco APIC REST APIThe Application Policy Infrastructure Controller REST API is the single programmatic interface into the ACI...Cisco ACI APIREST API for Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) providing programmable access to data center ne...
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
VMware Data Centers APIDatacenter management for organizing vSphere inventoryvSphere Web Services APIComprehensive SOAP-based API providing access to all vSphere management functionality including virtual mac...Cisco APIC REST APIThe Cisco APIC REST API manages Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) data center fabric. The API operat...Cisco UCS Manager APIThe UCS Manager XML API is the legacy programmatic interface for managing Cisco Unified Computing System bl...Dell OpenManage Enterprise Power Manager APIRESTful API for monitoring and managing power consumption, thermal conditions, and energy costs across Dell...Macrometa Data Centers APIThe Data Centers API from Macrometa — 7 operation(s) for data centers.Aruba Fabric Composer APIREST API for HPE Aruba Networking Fabric Composer, an intelligent software-defined orchestration solution t...
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Hetzner Data Centers APIEach Datacenter represents a _virtual_ Datacenter which may consist of possibly many physical Datacenters. ...Ansible Network Collection for Extreme SLX-OSAnsible collection for Extreme Networks SLX-OS data center switches. Provides modules for declarative confi...CUDO Compute Data Centers APIThe Data Centers API from CUDO Compute — 3 operation(s) for data centers.
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
EcoStruxure IT Expert APIThe EcoStruxure IT Expert API provides programmatic access to data center infrastructure management data. I...Lenovo XClarity Administrator REST APIThe Lenovo XClarity Administrator REST API provides programmatic access to XClarity Administrator data and ...AOS-CX REST APIThe AOS-CX REST API runs on-box on every AOS-CX switch (CX 6000/8000/9000/10000 series) and exposes the ful...HPE Aruba Networking Fabric Composer APIHPE Aruba Networking Fabric Composer (AFC) automates data-center fabric provisioning across AOS-CX leaf-spi...Nokia SR LinuxModern, Linux-based, fully model-driven network operating system for data-center and service-provider routi...
Companies reaching this through an API (12)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Center” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Aruba
Cisco
Cisco Hardware
Cisco Umbrella
Confluence
CUDO Compute
Dell Servers
Extreme Networks
Hetzner
Macrometa
Nokia
Schneider Electric Exchange
Score breakdown
Frequency
62.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
4.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
15.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
11.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Semiconductors 48 co-occurrences
Hardware 75 co-occurrences
AI Infrastructure 22 co-occurrences
Infrastructure 49 co-occurrences
Networking 36 co-occurrences
High Performance Computing 13 co-occurrences
Thermal Management 9 co-occurrences
Edge Computing 13 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag160
Api tag19
Openapi tag5
Openapi op tag18
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 134 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Center, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
134
of 160 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
14.1
-8.8 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
5.2
-6.7 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
2.5–67.4
median 9.3 · σ 13.8
How the 134 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 2Developing 10Thin 9Emerging 29Minimal 83
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.3 | -2.8 | 134 |
| Discoverability | 54.8 | 58.1 | -3.3 | 134 |
| Operational Transparency | 5.3 | 13.7 | -8.4 | 134 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.8 | 23.2 | -8.4 | 134 |
| Contract Quality | 8.2 | 17.6 | -9.4 | 134 |
| Access Clarity | 15.1 | 26.5 | -11.4 | 134 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 6% | 14% | -8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Nutanix 67.4
- 2 Cisco Intersight 59.7
- 3 Cisco ACI 55.6
- 4 VMware 52.3
- 5 Eaton 49.5
- 6 Microsoft Windows Server 48.1
- 7 TensorWave 48
- 8 CoreWeave 44.7
- 9 Brocade 44.4
- 10 BitFury 41.4
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Cisco ACI 35.5
- 2 Equinix 35.3
- 3 Cisco Intersight 29
- 4 Reed Semiconductor 26.3
- 5 Vapor IO 26.1
- 6 HorizonIQ 25.6
- 7 Vertiv 25.5
- 8 VMware 24.8
- 9 Positron 23.9
- 10 TensorWave 23.8
All 160 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 134 carry a score (84%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 129 of 134 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 129 of 134 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.