Semiconductors
Variants seen in the corpus:
SemiconductorSemiconductors
Providers using this tag (319)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 50 Early or largely undocumented
Reed SemiconductorEFFECT PhotonicsXilinxSequansArmAdvanced Materials Technology & EngineeringPragmaticAlif SemiconductorQuadricAchronix SemiconductorSilicon LabsMetalenzVishay IntertechnologyAmbiq MicroGraphcoreChipAgentsUpmemAmbarellaUhnderAmpere ComputingAkeanaPhononicXsight LabsAssetaams OSRAMAstera LabsMaxLinearScaleFluxSiMaSkyworks SolutionsCognichipCubefabsMKS InstrumentsproteanTecsMentor GraphicsKneronExtropicFabric8LabsEriduEfficient ComputerMicron TechnologySimanticKLARebellionsBirentechnologyd-MatrixAltaraQolabBlaizeCoherent Logix
Minimal 234 Almost no public developer surface
NeurophosGlobalFoundriesKandouMovandiE-PeasChipstackEmpower SemiconductorFractileNanotronicsSpeedataSyntiantoneNav3D Glass SolutionsJMEMVisibl SemiconductorsVSORAMojo VisionclounixLumotiveAragohoumoDeepSight TechnologyDiamond FoundryAuradine (Velaura AI)MeetFuture TechnologySilicon BoxBiren TechnologyAccusiliconAheadComputingCMC MaterialsAvicena TechConvenientPowerSubstrateTeradarAtonarpVertical SemiconductorRfmdAixinsemiconductortechnologyMajestic LabsMarvell TechnologyYuze SemiconductorADChem Semi-TechAerotech (Beijing)ATMI SalesAtom SemiconductorQuantumdiamondsAxera TechCIX TechnologySagence AIIdeal Power ConvertersonsemiMatXMauna Kea SemiconductorsPlexusNlightVaire ComputingCosemitechPliopsPseudolithicCalterahAltair SemiconductorAspinityAttotudeAwavesemiBaya SystemsCrossbarCvachipDiscovered MaterialsEdgeQEnfabricaFabric CryptographyPower LatticeRapid SiliconAccelerCommatantaresCelera SemiconductorEvonetixAdaps PhotonicsAvago TechnologiesEliyanEntegrisFangTekLinear Technology CorporationSyentaTransphormAcela MicroAgrani LabsArilincAvneraBright Silicon TechnologiesBritesemieigencommLara NetworksNatural Intelligence SystemsPixelworksRicursiveTattvamAirtouchSJSemiChuruiintelligentCypressAtomic SemiBeijinggoldenlinktechnologycoBestcompoundsemiconductorCelero CommunicationsChonghuisemiconductorChuantumicroelectronicsCrystallinesemiconductorCubicPVTela InnovationsAkash SystemsChenxinsemiconductorAmber WaveEnpirionNorstelAMDCrystalEnergy MicroInnoviumNubisSilicon ClocksVertical CircuitsYunyinggu (Viewtrix Technology)BintangchipKumu NetworksLam ResearchTSMCSiTeraAMCC (Applied Micro Circuits Corporation)Anobit TechnologiesCalxedaConexant SystemsCortina SystemsEchelonFinisarFreescale SemiconductorGalileo TechnologyIBEX Process TechnologyicerasemiLink A MediaLSI LogicPrimesenseQualteraQuantum Effect DevSandforceSibeamSilicon OptixSynplicityLightelligenceAitomaticGradiantAyar LabsDiraqOmnitron SensorsSaphluxIontraLytePhotonicNextSiliconTensordyneChelsio CommunicationsForge NanoArena AIAstrusLumilensnEye SystemsSeeqcPhysicsxPorotech6KClarosI-PulseFrore SystemsOxford IonicsEntalpicAzurengineLightspeed PhotonicsOssiaSiLCAdvance CompositeNcodiNOpenlightMipsDisplayLinkHabana LabsChipletzPicoJoolAcaciaAfalightApplied MaterialsQuintessentUnconventional AIAdvancechipAicheng TechnologyPixcelPsiQuantumBouffalo LabLuminous ComputingAaltosemiMythicSnowcap ComputeChinaiST Testing ServiceFujian Deer TechnologyCencorpNVEAtrisaCornamiDustPhotonicsElephintHardware IntelligenceLuxvisions InnovationQuantum MotionS3 Graphicssupermag1366 TechnologiesChEmpowerArchitect LabsLuminus DevicesOlixCYGIAVathysHyperLightCelestial AIAvanexDiablo TechnologiesFungibleFusion I/OLightLogicMaker CommsNanoconductionNanteroNervana SystemsPliant TechnologySymmorphix
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Semiconductors” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
68.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
7.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
9.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
24.9
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
319 providers carry this tag directly, and 327 counting the 8 narrower tags below — 8 more to reach.
Chip Design
18 providers
Chips
12 providers
Electronic Design Automation
12 providers
Integrated Circuits
13 providers
Microcontrollers
13 providers
Optical Interconnect
13 providers
Power Management
16 providers
Silicon Photonics
15 providers
Related tags
Hardware 183 co-occurrences
Data Center 48 co-occurrences
Photonics 29 co-occurrences
Deep Tech 36 co-occurrences
AI Infrastructure 27 co-occurrences
Chip Design 18 co-occurrences
Embedded Systems 15 co-occurrences
Edge AI 16 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag319
Api tag5
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag1
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Semiconductor Consortia (RISC-V, OCP hardware, CHIPS awards) | 55% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 241 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Semiconductors, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
241
of 319 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
even vs catalog
Mean Agent Readiness
3.1
-8.9 vs catalog 12
Spread
–
median · σ
How the 241 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 7Thin 13Emerging 49Minimal 171
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.2 | 6.5 | -4.3 | 241 |
| Discoverability | 52.4 | 57.9 | -5.5 | 241 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.5 | 13 | -9.5 | 241 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.5 | 23.2 | -11.7 | 241 |
| Access Clarity | 10.5 | 23.9 | -13.4 | 241 |
| Contract Quality | 2.9 | 17.2 | -14.3 | 241 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 94% | 98% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 16% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Renesas {"score" => 42, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 EFFECT Photonics {"score" => 40, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Ethernovia {"score" => 35.2, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Advanced Micro Devices {"score" => 33.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Picarro {"score" => 30.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Moore Threads {"score" => 28.1, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 7 Cerebras Systems {"score" => 28, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 8 Texas Instruments {"score" => 27.4, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 9 Mentor Graphics {"score" => 27.3, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 10 Reed Semiconductor {"score" => 26.3, "band" => "agent-aware"}
All 319 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 241 carry a score (76%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 235 of 241 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 235 of 241 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 31 October 2026, across 31983 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.