Semiconductors
Variants seen in the corpus:
SemiconductorSemiconductors
Providers using this tag (302)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 43 Early or largely undocumented
EFFECT PhotonicsAxiadoKneronSequansExtropicArmFabric8LabsEriduAdvanced Materials Technology & EngineeringAchronix SemiconductorVishay IntertechnologyAlif SemiconductorMetalenzSilicon LabsReed SemiconductorGraphcoreUhnderUpmemAmbiq MicroAmbarellaChipAgentsAkeanaBirentechnologyAmpere Computingd-MatrixPhononicRebellionsEfficient ComputerAltaraQolabAstera LabsScaleFluxAssetaQuadricams OSRAMMaxLinearCognichipKLASiMaNeurophosLightelligenceproteanTecsGradiant
Minimal 223 Almost no public developer surface
DiraqIontraSaphluxAitomaticEmpower SemiconductorSpeedataBlaizePhotonicE-PeasKandouMovandiOmnitron SensorsChelsio CommunicationsPragmaticChipstackForge NanoJMEMNanotronicsTensordyneLumilensVSORAFractileMojo VisionNextSiliconnEye SystemsVisibl SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions3D Glass SolutionsArena AIAstrusSeeqcXsight LabsMKS InstrumentsPhysicsxLumotive6KClarosI-PulseSilicon BoxAuradine (Velaura AI)DeepSight TechnologyDiamond FoundryLyteFrore SystemsMeetFuture TechnologyOxford IonicsAvicena TechBiren TechnologyAheadComputingAzurengineEntalpicTeradarAragoCMC MaterialsOssiaAtonarpAdvance CompositeNcodiNOpenlightclounixConvenientPowerDisplayLinkMipsSubstrateVertical SemiconductorAccusiliconHabana LabsAixinsemiconductortechnologyAdvancechipUnconventional AIPicoJoolYuze SemiconductorAcaciaADChem Semi-TechAerotech (Beijing)ATMI SalesAtom SemiconductorQuantumdiamondsQuintessentAxera TechMajestic LabsSagence AISimanticBaya SystemsIdeal Power ConvertersMarvell TechnologyVaire ComputingRfmdonsemiPliopsRapid SiliconAfalightAicheng TechnologyMauna Kea SemiconductorsPixcelTransphormAdaps PhotonicsAvago TechnologiesNlightPlexusAccelerCommAyar LabsDustPhotonicsEliyanMatXPsiQuantumLuminous ComputingPseudolithicSyntiantSiLCAaltosemiAltair SemiconductorAspinityAttotudeAwavesemiCIX TechnologyCrossbarDiscovered MaterialsEdgeQEnfabricaFabric CryptographySJSemiSnowcap ComputeatantaresBouffalo LabEvonetixFujian Deer TechnologyPower LatticeCencorpFangTekhoumoLinear Technology CorporationLightspeed PhotonicsSyentaAcela MicroAtrisaAvneraBright Silicon TechnologiesBritesemiCornamieigencommLara NetworksLuxvisions InnovationPixelworksQuantum MotionS3 GraphicssupermagAgrani LabsArilincElephintHardware IntelligenceMythicNatural Intelligence SystemsRicursiveTattvam1366 TechnologiesEntegrisNVEVathysAirtouchAkash SystemsArchitect LabsAtomic SemiBeijinggoldenlinktechnologycoBestcompoundsemiconductorCelero CommunicationsLuminus DevicesOlixTela InnovationsKumu NetworksAmber WaveCypressEnpirionNorstelCrystalCYGIAEnergy MicroHyperLightInnoviumMentor GraphicsNubisoneNavPorotechSilicon ClocksVertical CircuitsYunyinggu (Viewtrix Technology)AMDCelestial AIBintangchipLam ResearchTSMCSiTeraAMCC (Applied Micro Circuits Corporation)Anobit TechnologiesAvanexCalxedaConexant SystemsCortina SystemsDiablo TechnologiesEchelonFinisarFreescale SemiconductorFungibleFusion I/OGalileo TechnologyIBEX Process TechnologyicerasemiLightLogicLink A MediaLSI LogicMaker CommsNanoconductionNanteroNervana SystemsPliant TechnologyPrimesenseQualteraQuantum Effect DevSandforceSibeamSilicon OptixSymmorphixSynplicity
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Semiconductors” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
68.4
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
7.8
spread across providers
Quality lift
10.8
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
25.7
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
302 providers carry this tag directly, and 309 counting the 8 narrower tags below — 7 more to reach.
Chip Design
18 providers
Chips
12 providers
Electronic Design Automation
12 providers
Integrated Circuits
13 providers
Microcontrollers
13 providers
Optical Interconnect
13 providers
Power Management
15 providers
Silicon Photonics
15 providers
Related tags
Hardware 181 co-occurrences
Data Center 48 co-occurrences
Photonics 29 co-occurrences
Deep Tech 36 co-occurrences
AI Infrastructure 27 co-occurrences
Chip Design 18 co-occurrences
Embedded Systems 15 co-occurrences
Edge AI 16 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag302
Api tag5
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag1
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 230 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Semiconductors, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
230
of 302 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
10.6
-12.3 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
3.2
-8.7 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–59.1
median 7 · σ 10.3
How the 230 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 1Developing 7Thin 14Emerging 43Minimal 165
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.4 | 6.3 | -3.9 | 230 |
| Discoverability | 52.4 | 58.1 | -5.7 | 230 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.6 | 13.7 | -10.1 | 230 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.8 | 23.2 | -11.4 | 230 |
| Contract Quality | 3.2 | 17.6 | -14.4 | 230 |
| Access Clarity | 10.8 | 26.5 | -15.7 | 230 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 12% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 94% | 98% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Cerebras Systems 59.1
- 2 Advanced Micro Devices 54.1
- 3 Moore Threads 46.3
- 4 Picarro 45.5
- 5 Renesas 43.4
- 6 FuriosaAI 43.3
- 7 Analog Devices 41.8
- 8 Preferred Networks 40
- 9 Texas Instruments 38.7
- 10 Cadence Design Systems 36.8
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Renesas 38.7
- 2 EFFECT Photonics 38.7
- 3 Ethernovia 37.2
- 4 Advanced Micro Devices 32.1
- 5 Picarro 30.8
- 6 Moore Threads 28.1
- 7 Texas Instruments 27.7
- 8 Cerebras Systems 26.4
- 9 Reed Semiconductor 26.3
- 10 Applied Materials 24.8
All 302 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 230 carry a score (76%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 222 of 230 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 222 of 230 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.