Semiconductors
SemiconductorSemiconductors
Providers using this tag (294)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 46 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 197 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 27 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Semiconductors” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
294 providers carry this tag directly, and 300 counting the 8 narrower tags below — 6 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 223 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Semiconductors, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.5 | 6.5 | -4 | 223 |
| Discoverability | 54.9 | 61 | -6.1 | 223 |
| Operational Transparency | 3.7 | 14 | -10.3 | 223 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.7 | 23.4 | -11.7 | 223 |
| Access Clarity | 11 | 26.5 | -15.5 | 223 |
| Contract Quality | 4.1 | 20.1 | -16 | 223 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 13% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 3% | 11% | -8 |
| Security | 89% | 96% | -7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cerebras Systems 58.8
- 2 Advanced Micro Devices 55.2
- 3 Picarro 49.1
- 4 Moore Threads 46.7
- 5 aiCTX (now SynSense) 44.2
- 6 FuriosaAI 44.1
- 7 Renesas 43.5
- 8 Analog Devices 42.5
- 9 Preferred Networks 39.2
- 10 Texas Instruments 38.9
- 1 Fabric8Labs 52.5
- 2 EFFECT Photonics 47.7
- 3 Renesas 40.8
- 4 Ethernovia 37.2
- 5 Advanced Micro Devices 34
- 6 Picarro 32.9
- 7 Metalenz 32.1
- 8 Eridu 28.7
- 9 Moore Threads 28.1
- 10 Texas Instruments 27.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.