AI Infrastructure
Providers using this tag (95)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 44 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Infrastructure” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 86 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Infrastructure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.8 | 23.4 | +4.4 | 86 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.5 | 14 | +0.5 | 86 |
| Discoverability | 61 | 61 | 0 | 86 |
| Contract Governance | 5.1 | 6.5 | -1.4 | 86 |
| Access Clarity | 24.8 | 26.5 | -1.7 | 86 |
| Contract Quality | 13.3 | 20.1 | -6.8 | 86 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 10% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Modal 64.8
- 2 Koyeb 64.3
- 3 Compresr 61.5
- 4 Cerebras Systems 58.8
- 5 Spectro Cloud 57.9
- 6 Crusoe 53.6
- 7 Mithril 53.1
- 8 Unify 52
- 9 turbopuffer 51.4
- 10 Speko 50.3
- 1 Speko 60.5
- 2 Seltz 49.1
- 3 Koyeb 39.8
- 4 Compresr 35.6
- 5 Crusoe 35.6
- 6 Mithril 33.9
- 7 Modal 33.5
- 8 Moveworks (ServiceNow) 33.4
- 9 Fluence 30.7
- 10 Understudy Labs 28.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.