Hardware
Providers using this tag (691)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 133 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 479 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (26)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (19)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Hardware” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
691 providers carry this tag directly, and 692 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 564 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Hardware, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.9 | 6.3 | -3.4 | 564 |
| Discoverability | 53.4 | 58.1 | -4.7 | 564 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.1 | 13.7 | -9.6 | 564 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 12.6 | 23.2 | -10.6 | 564 |
| Access Clarity | 13.2 | 26.5 | -13.3 | 564 |
| Contract Quality | 3.7 | 17.6 | -13.9 | 564 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 14% | -8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Particle 62.2
- 2 Google Quantum AI 57.7
- 3 IonQ 56.7
- 4 Wahoo Fitness 51.9
- 5 TARXAN 50.3
- 6 Cisco Hardware 48.5
- 7 Nest 47.8
- 8 Alice Bob 47.7
- 9 AgiBot 47.1
- 10 Google Distributed Cloud 47
- 1 First Resonance 45.5
- 2 Renesas 38.7
- 3 EFFECT Photonics 38.7
- 4 Cofactr 38.3
- 5 Ethernovia 37.2
- 6 ColdSnap 36
- 7 AgiBot 35.8
- 8 Clover 33.6
- 9 Tarana Wireless 33.5
- 10 Telemetron 32.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.