Robotics
Providers using this tag (429)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 123 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 258 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (24)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Robotics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
429 providers carry this tag directly, and 435 counting the 8 narrower tags below — 6 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 395 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Robotics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.2 | 6.5 | -4.3 | 395 |
| Discoverability | 55.6 | 61 | -5.4 | 395 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.9 | 14 | -9.1 | 395 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 13.1 | 23.4 | -10.3 | 395 |
| Access Clarity | 14.2 | 26.5 | -12.3 | 395 |
| Contract Quality | 4.3 | 20.1 | -15.8 | 395 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 10% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 13% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 13% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Sift Stack 60.7
- 2 Viam 60.2
- 3 Foxglove Technologies 59
- 4 Uthana 50.7
- 5 Aerones 50.6
- 6 Amazon DeepRacer 49.9
- 7 Dronecode Foundation 48.1
- 8 Dexterity 46
- 9 Bear Robotics 45.2
- 10 Amazon RoboMaker 44.7
- 1 Aerones 48.4
- 2 Virtual Incision 46.4
- 3 Sift Stack 39.7
- 4 Voltair 39
- 5 AgiBot 37.9
- 6 Ethernovia 37.2
- 7 Swift Navigation 37.1
- 8 Amazon RoboMaker 36.3
- 9 Foxglove Technologies 35.9
- 10 Metalenz 32.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.